- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:18:34 +0100
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- CC: alanruttenberg@gmail.com, public-owl-wg@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 11 March 2008 14:18:54 UTC
Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > > 3/ The examples in the primer are rendered in four different syntaxes, > Manchester, Functional-Style, OWL XML, and RDF/XML. Each can be > turned on and off separately. Protege 4 was used to generate the > different syntaxes, starting from the same ontology in Protege 4. > The complete ontologies are on the WG Wiki at > http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/PrimerExampleManchester > http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/PrimerExampleFunctional > http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/PrimerExampleOWLXML > http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/PrimerExampleRDFXML > However, the versions in the document have be extensively edited, and > also modified to fix several bugs in Protege 4. The probably would > not read back into Protege 4 or any other OWL 1.1 tool. (If you do > try this and can fix the files, please do so, but only if you also > change the Primer document itself.) Before final publication the > examples will have to be fixed to be completely correct. > I would very much favour of having a turtle version, too. It is widely used in the community and, mainly for a primer, the readability of the example in Turtle is a major plus. Ivan -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Tuesday, 11 March 2008 14:18:54 UTC