- From: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 18:57:21 +0000
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org
Good suggestion. I asked Boris to at least set up this basic structure, and I think that he has now done so. We can of course discuss how "well thought out" the sentences are :-) Ian On 26 Mar 2008, at 15:23, Sandro Hawke wrote: > > > Right now, it looks like the abstracts all start with the same text > and > then have a custom sentence or two. As a reader, I find that awkward > (doing the diff in my head), and I think it short-changes the > differences between the documents. > > Let's have each abstract be two paragraphs, where the first > paragraph is > shared among all the documents (we can make it a wiki page, > Shared_Abstract and just template-include it) and the second paragraph > is custom for that document. And the second paragraph should be a > few > well-thought-out sentences. (eg, unlike in XML Serialization > where it > is "This document specifies an XML exchange syntax for OWL 1.1." :-) > > -- Sandro >
Received on Friday, 28 March 2008 18:58:04 UTC