Re: ACTION-93 are all OWL 1.0 ontologies representable in RDF from Alan Ruttenberg on 2008-03-12 (public-owl-wg@w3.org from March 2008)

From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:57:23 -0400
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <325DB781-F27E-4469-A094-58C9578A197A@gmail.com>

On Mar 12, 2008, at 2:35 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:

> In OWL 1.0 every OWL DL ontology can be expressed in the abstract  
> syntax
> and also as an RDF graph, via the transformation in
> http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-semantics/semantics-all.html#4.1 (which does
> not depend on a separated vocabulary).  However, such RDF graphs

What is the referent of "such RDF graphs", please?

> are not
> "OWL DL ontologies in RDF graph form" because these must have a
> separated vocabulary.

-Alan

Received on Wednesday, 12 March 2008 18:57:42 UTC