- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:34:37 -0400 (EDT)
- To: alanruttenberg@gmail.com
- Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org
From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com> Subject: Re: ACTION-93 are all OWL 1.0 ontologies representable in RDF Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:57:23 -0400 > > On Mar 12, 2008, at 2:35 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > > > In OWL 1.0 every OWL DL ontology can be expressed in the abstract syntax > > and also as an RDF graph, via the transformation in > > http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-semantics/semantics-all.html#4.1 (which does > > not depend on a separated vocabulary). However, such RDF graphs > > What is the referent of "such RDF graphs", please? "an RDF graph" > > are not > > "OWL DL ontologies in RDF graph form" because these must have a > > separated vocabulary. peter
Received on Wednesday, 12 March 2008 19:38:33 UTC