- From: OWL Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2008 14:49:23 +0000 (GMT)
- To: public-owl-wg@w3.org
ISSUE-96 (OWL1.1 vocabulary names): OWL-1.1 vocabulary naming in RDF mapping is not consistent
http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/tracker/issues/
Raised by: Michael Schneider
On product:
In the RDF mapping, we have the following URIs:
* owl11:subObjectPropertyOf
* owl11:equivalentObjectProperty
* owl11:disjointObjectProperties
At least the names for the 2nd URI (singular) and 3rd URI (plural) will perhaps lead to confusion. I suggest to use names close to the existing names in OWL-1.0:
* keep "owl11:subObjectPropertyOf", since there is "rdfs:subPropertyOf"
* keep "owl11:equivalentObjectProperty", since there is "owl:equivalentProperty"
* change "owl11:disjointObjectProperties" to
* either "owl11:disjointObjectProperty" to match "owl:equivalentProperty"
* or "owl11:dijointObjectPropertyWith" to match "owl:disjointWith" for classes
The same changes will then have to be performed for data properties, too, of course.
Michael Schneider
Received on Sunday, 2 March 2008 14:49:30 UTC