Re: comment on the fragment document: (inverse) functional and DL-Lite

On 6 Mar 2008, at 11:56, Boris Motik wrote:
[snip]
> Now you are right in that we forgot to list the (inverse)functional  
> object properties in the list of the missing features of
> DL-lite. Thanks for that; I've updated the document. If you find  
> further omissions, please let us know and I'll add them to the
> appropriate section.
[snip]

Aren't DataProperties missing altogether? Is this going to remain?

	http://owl-workshop.man.ac.uk/acceptedLong/submission_23.pdf

has some work on data values in DL Lite (though with some confusing  
presentation, for me).

Cheers,
Bijan.

Received on Thursday, 6 March 2008 12:19:02 UTC