- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 20:46:48 +0000
- To: "Web Ontology Language ((OWL)) Working Group WG" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
After hearing a fair bit of support and no objections to my restructuring experiments, and in anticipation of us perhaps wanting to publish new working drafts, and given the need to make progress on user facing documents, and in consultation with various people working on the core trio documents, I've started restructuring the editor's drafts of the Structural Specification document and the Semantics document. STRUCTURAL SPEC: http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Syntax The first change I've made to the structural spec is primarily adding new headers and introducing a more regular style of presentation to each section. There has been some light editing (e.g., dropping "The grammar for foo is as follows"), and I've consolidated all the details about annotation into a single section but have not yet rewritten it to make sense: DIFF: http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php? title=Syntax&diff=4052&oldid=3619 Note that I have put in place holder for illustrative examples, but haven't filled in most of them. I *welcome* contributions!!! I hope people feel that there is a big improvement just from looking at the table of contents. (There are still tweaks to be done in the gross structure, of course, but I think this is much more explicit and thus more informative at-a-glance.) I then replaced the old intro with the one from the strucref experiment. I introduce the distinction between entities, expressions, and axioms which I used in the headers: DIFF: http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php? title=Syntax&diff=4053&oldid=4052 SEMANTICS: http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Semantics I added some analogous headers to the Semantics Document: DIFF: http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/index.php? title=Semantics&curid=152&diff=3500&oldid=3284 I've not yet added cross links or tried to subdivide tables in any way. NEXT STEPS Things on the list: * start adding more cross referencing links *e.g., from the primer * fill in examples * Make examples appear in user preferred syntax * add and flesh out explanatory text * clean up annotations section * add selective display (e.g., if you don't want UML or you don't want the grammar or you don't want the examples) * work on index I think the primer will be much nicer if it has cross links into more detailed descriptions, so I think it would be nice to publish another working draft of the strucspec when we publish the primer (which I hope is around the next heartbeat). We've made a variety of substantive changes as well to the strucspec, plus I think if we can improve the readabiilty substantively, to refresh the WD. Feedback welcome, as always. Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Wednesday, 5 March 2008 20:44:46 UTC