- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:20:07 +0000
- To: OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Oops, I just did some reviewing of the XML Syntax and I think I'm
slated for the fragments doc. Or rather I wanted only one :) But I
see I have actions for both. Sigh.
Well, I've done some reviewing of the XML Syntax document. I wanted
to remind reviewers that you can inline comments using the review
template e.g.,:
{{Review|~~~~|I'd make the prior paragraph a temporary editors note.
It shouldn't appear in the final spec.}}
(the ~~~~ gets auto expanded with your name and a timestamp, a la:
{{Review|[[User:BijanParsia|BijanParsia]] 08:31, 14 March 2008 (EDT)|
I'd make the prior paragraph a temporary editors note. It shouldn't
appear in the final spec.}}
)
One thing that would be nice is if I could generate a text file of my
review comments (with back pointers) so that I could email them to
the list with more "overally" comments....
My overall comment is that it's fine to go. I'd really like the
examples removed or the owl11xml prefixes removed (since they make
the examples illegible). With the primer there's some question as to
whether we should have examples at all. Structuring it a bit more
like the RDF Mapping (i.e., terse, with a description of the
methodology of the derivation of the schema, then the schema might be
enough.) I wouldn't mind a somewhat richer introduction.
Cheers,
Bijan.
Received on Friday, 14 March 2008 14:18:38 UTC