Re: Proposal to resolve ISSUE-86

• From: Michael Smith <msmith@clarkparsia.com>
• Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 09:45:59 -0400
• To: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
• Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org
• Message-Id: <1206539159.6984.19.camel@msmith-laptop-wired.int.clarkparsia.com>

On Sun, 2008-03-16 at 21:30 -0400, Alan Ruttenberg wrote:
> RDF/XML serialization for anonymous inverse properties

> I think it is beneficial to allow for anonymous inverses in  
> ObjectPropertyAssertion.

Can you elaborate this?  If we don't have a real requirement for this,
the simplest resolution* to ISSUE-86 is to require named object
properties in object property assertions.

I.e., change

objectPropertyAssertion := 'ObjectPropertyAssertion' '(' { annotation } objectPropertyExpression sourceIndividualURI targetIndividualURI ')'

to

objectPropertyAssertion := 'ObjectPropertyAssertion' '(' { annotation } objectPropertyURI sourceIndividualURI targetIndividualURI ')'

Regards,
-- 
Mike Smith

Clark & Parsia

* Thanks to Evren for reporting this issue and suggesting this simple
resolution to me.

Received on Wednesday, 26 March 2008 13:46:45 UTC