- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 16:31:06 -0400 (EDT)
- To: sandro@w3.org
- Cc: alanruttenberg@gmail.com, public-owl-wg@w3.org
From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Subject: Re: XML Serialization (xml comment, schema)
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 16:18:27 -0400
>
> > > The set was in the wrong direction (I was using for testing, as you had alr
> > eady reverted to the prior version - why?)
> >
> > So that I could run the document through an XML Schema validator.
>
> I hear, again, a distant bell tolling for the wiki. :-)
>
> Still, I think I have figured out a super-hack workaround.
>
> I made a template LT which is the character <. Then I redid the XML
> comments from <!-- to {{LT}}!--. This makes the wiki software no
> longer treat them as comments, and just transmit them as text.
>
> Now, to get the schema itself, you need the special URL:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/OWL_XML_Schema&action=raw&ctype=application/xml&templates=expand
>
> We'll need to add "application/xml" to the list of allowed media types.
> For now, it will ignore that parameter with that value and send it as
> text/x-wiki [1]. But the bytes transmitted seem okay, I think.
>
> Now, I think we want that URL to appear in non-wiki namespace, as
> something like
> http://www.w3.org/2008/owl11xml
> which I have done with some .htaccess hackery.
>
> Does this solve our schema/wiki problems?
>
> (i've ignored questions of namespace -vs- schema location /
> namespace-document -vs- schema.)
>
> -- Sandro
>
> [1] http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Parameters_to_index.php
This does look like a way to proceed. I'll check later to see if
everything works.
Thanks,
peter
Received on Thursday, 20 March 2008 20:39:04 UTC