- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 16:31:06 -0400 (EDT)
- To: sandro@w3.org
- Cc: alanruttenberg@gmail.com, public-owl-wg@w3.org
From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> Subject: Re: XML Serialization (xml comment, schema) Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 16:18:27 -0400 > > > > The set was in the wrong direction (I was using for testing, as you had alr > > eady reverted to the prior version - why?) > > > > So that I could run the document through an XML Schema validator. > > I hear, again, a distant bell tolling for the wiki. :-) > > Still, I think I have figured out a super-hack workaround. > > I made a template LT which is the character <. Then I redid the XML > comments from <!-- to {{LT}}!--. This makes the wiki software no > longer treat them as comments, and just transmit them as text. > > Now, to get the schema itself, you need the special URL: > > http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/OWL_XML_Schema&action=raw&ctype=application/xml&templates=expand > > We'll need to add "application/xml" to the list of allowed media types. > For now, it will ignore that parameter with that value and send it as > text/x-wiki [1]. But the bytes transmitted seem okay, I think. > > Now, I think we want that URL to appear in non-wiki namespace, as > something like > http://www.w3.org/2008/owl11xml > which I have done with some .htaccess hackery. > > Does this solve our schema/wiki problems? > > (i've ignored questions of namespace -vs- schema location / > namespace-document -vs- schema.) > > -- Sandro > > [1] http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Manual:Parameters_to_index.php This does look like a way to proceed. I'll check later to see if everything works. Thanks, peter
Received on Thursday, 20 March 2008 20:39:04 UTC