Agenda for teleconference Wednesday March 19, 2008

The agenda is at http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Teleconference. 
2008.03.19/Agenda

It is also reproduced below for your convenience:


Call in details

If joining late please don't identify yourself verbally; instead,  
Identify Yourself to ZAKIM on IRC

     * Date of Call: Wednesday March 19, 2008
     * Time of Call: 1700 UTC, 10:00 (West US), 13:00 (East US),  
17:00 (London), 18:00 (Paris)
     * Dial-In #: +1.617.761.6200 (Cambridge, MA)
     * Dial-In #: +33.4.89.06.34.99 (Nice, France)
     * Dial-In #: +44.117.370.6152 (Bristol, UK)
     * Participant Access Code: 69594# (OWLWG)
     * IRC Channel: irc.w3.org port 6665 channel #owl  
([irc:irc.w3.org:6665/owl])
     * Web-based IRC (member-only): http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc  
(Firefox IRC addon: chatzilla)
     * Duration: 90 minutes
     * Chair: Ian Horrocks
     * Scribe: Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Scribe List)
     * Link to Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Teleconference. 
2008.03.19/Agenda

[edit] Agenda

     * ADMIN (20 min)
           o Roll call
           o Agenda amendments
           o Europeans: Note, due to daylight savings time meeting  
will be 1 hour earlier for the next three weeks, ie, for the meeting  
starting next week until the end of March.
           o PROPOSED: Accept Previous Minutes (12 March)
           o F2F: Registration Fees and Signup
           o Action items status
                 + Pending Review Actions
                       # Action 103 Check whether all OWL 1.0  
ontologies are representable in RDF / Peter Patel-Schneider
                       # Action 110 Review the fragments document /  
Michael Smith
                 + Due and overdue Actions
                       # Action 43 Develop scripts to extract test  
cases from wiki, coordinating with Bijan, Jeremy, Alan / Sandro  
HawkeSend
                       # Action 72 Put his use case for punning onto  
a wiki page (for reasoning associated with punned properties, and the  
question about object data property punning vs annotation  
properties) / Alan Ruttenberg
                       # Action 76 Arrange HP review of OWL Prime  
page / Jeremy Carroll
                       # Action 86 Send proposal for issue-91  
ontology property / Jeremy Carroll
                       # Action 90 Summarize problem with bnodes in  
ISSUE-3 vs bnodes in OWL list / Jeremy Carroll
                       # Action 100 Put n3 version of rules on wiki  
with pointer to documentation. All to review and discuss via email /  
James Hendler
                       # Action 101 Summarize current state of issue  
91 / Alan Ruttenberg
                       # Action 102 Work with Michael to clarify  
semantics of deprecatedclass so that peter becomes happy / James Hendler
                       # Action 104 Start editing the Fragments  
document by the end of next week / Achille Fokoue
                       # Action 105 To review primer / Deborah  
McGuinness
                       # Action 106 Review the XML doc and the  
fragment / Achille Fokoue
                       # Action 107 Review the XML document / Bijan  
Parsia
                       # Action 108 Review the XML document / Sandro  
Hawke
                       # Action 109 Review just the fragment / Bijan  
Parsia
     * Raised Issues (15 minutes)
     * Proposals to Resolve Issues
           o Issue 102 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl- 
wg/2008Mar/0149.html
           o Issue 79 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl- 
wg/2008Mar/0191.html
           o Issue 78 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl- 
wg/2008Mar/0194.html
           o Issue 75 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl- 
wg/2008Mar/0185.html
           o Issue 16 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl- 
wg/2008Mar/0168.html
     * General Discussions (30 min)
           o Next steps towards working drafts
                 + Reviews (see Actions above)
                 + Status of fragments document
                 + Formal votes to publish
     * Issues (20 min)
           o Resolved Editorial Issues
           o Issue Discussions
                 + Issue 100 Should there be valid OWL DL ontologies  
that can not be expressed as OWL DL ontologies in RDF graph form
                 + Issue 71 create datarange of literals matching  
given language range
     * Additional other business (5 min)

[edit] Next Week(s)

     * General Discussions (not necessarily in this order)
           o Fragments and Conformance
           o Imports
           o OWL 1.1 Full (see Mapping to RDF, OWL DL/Full  
compatibility)
           o Versioning
           o Easy Keys
           o Rich Annotations
           o Test Cases

[edit]

Received on Tuesday, 18 March 2008 17:13:35 UTC