Re: proposal to close ...-102 from Peter F. Patel-Schneider on 2008-03-13 (public-owl-wg@w3.org from March 2008)

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 06:21:29 -0400 (EDT)
To: alanruttenberg@gmail.com
Cc: public-owl-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <20080313.062129.263000077.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>

From: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: proposal to close ISSUE-102
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 01:47:41 -0400

> Hi Peter,
> 
> I suppose this is a consequence of punning, but I notice now that
> ontologies consisting solely of "annotationProperty(:foo)" would not
> generate any triple. (actually this seems to be the same for otherwise
> unused object and datatype properties too).
> 
> Also, can an RDF graph with only the triple: x rdf:Type
> (Annotation|Datatype|Object)Property be translated into an OWL1.1
> ontology?
> 
> -Alan

No new issue is created here.  The situation is exactly the same as for
object and data properties and for classes.  

You may remember that ISSUE-89 is concerned with precisely this issue.

peter

Received on Thursday, 13 March 2008 10:24:36 UTC