Re: comment on the fragment document: (inverse) functional and DL-Lite

On 6 Mar 2008, at 12:25, Boris Motik wrote:

> Hello,
>
> We are aware of the fact that data properties are missing in DL- 
> lite. The reason why we haven't included them yet into the document
> is because we wanted to have an opportunity to talk to the Romans  
> and ask them about some technical details. (We thought of doing
> this at the DL workshop in May.)

Cool. I added an EdNote to this effect, pointing to your email:
	http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/wiki/Fragments_Proposal#DL-Lite

Cheers,
Bijan.

Received on Thursday, 6 March 2008 12:33:59 UTC