- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2008 14:53:09 +0000
- To: Carsten Lutz <clu@tcs.inf.tu-dresden.de>
- CC: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@comlab.ox.ac.uk>, Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.rpi.edu>, Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>, "Web Ontology Language ((OWL)) Working Group WG" <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Apologies if this duplicates earlier discussion, I am behind on the e-mail traffic. The main thing that I took from the WG telecon discussion of the fragments, which I don't find in the document is a very high level motivation: This fragment is intended for X This fragment is intended for Y etc. I suggest that could go in the introduction. I realise that the complexity section justifies such statements, but feel that the intent that was fairly clear in the WG discussion should be clear to the casual reader (i.e. who reads the beginning and then gives up, because it gets too technical!) of this document. Jeremy
Received on Friday, 7 March 2008 14:53:38 UTC