- From: Elisa F. Kendall <ekendall@sandsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 05:23:23 -0700
- To: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>
- CC: OWL Working Group WG <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
Hi Alan, I exchanged email with Li Ding, who originally created the semantic web card you've referenced, below. He provided the original MS Word version we can use as a starting point - will email Ivan off list on migrating that to some other form so that we can "play with it". Thanks, Elisa Alan Ruttenberg wrote: > > Conversation with Ivan: > > Alan: > There's some interest in having something like a quick reference > card. Formatting/typesetting of this card would be important, in > order to have it fit on the page, etc. However Peter pointed out that > this may not be to the W3C's liking for reasons of accessibility, > viewing on any device, etc, so I was tasked with an action to ask you > about what guidelines are with respect to this. > > There's a semantic web one that someone produced that is inspiration. > http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/resource/html/id/94/ > Basically we're still trying to avoid a situation where we create > redundant documents. This would be a creative way of handling an > important function of the overview and there was general agreement > in the UFDTF that this sort of thing is useful. > > Ivan: > > AFAIK, such cards have been produced before both for OWL and SPARQL > (but I may be wrong). But never as an 'official' W3C deliverable. > > Peter is right that there would be quite a problem with W3C producing > a W3C recommendation or any other document in PDF (only). If somebody > could come up with a clever way of achieving the same effect with CSS > (and then have it in forms of PDF, too), well, that could work. > Otherwise we keep it non-official. > > -Alan > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 12 March 2008 12:23:41 UTC