- From: Michael Smith <msmith@clarkparsia.com>
- Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2008 09:28:51 -0500
- To: public-owl-wg <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
On Thu, 2008-03-06 at 12:25 +0000, Boris Motik wrote: > We are aware of the fact that data properties are missing in DL-lite. The reason why we haven't included them yet into the document > is because we wanted to have an opportunity to talk to the Romans and ask them about some technical details. More generally, as pointed out much earlier (see [ISSUE-80]), there are many variants of DL-Lite and the one described does not match up directly with any of them. Can we have one of the DL-Lite authors join the WG rather than defer such questions? I think a number of expressivity issues (such as those mentioned by Bijan in [1]) need to be decided w.r.t. the DL-Lite fragment and wonder if a focused discussion forum (e.g. task-force or mailing list or telecon) is possible and would be helpful. -- Mike Smith Clark & Parsia [ISSUE-80] http://www.w3.org/2007/OWL/tracker/issues/80 [1] http://www.w3.org/mid/82A5083E-5F9C-41C3-B987-E1B77E919B2E@cs.man.ac.uk
Received on Friday, 7 March 2008 14:29:13 UTC