- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:40:41 +0000
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>, alanruttenberg@gmail.com, public-owl-wg@w3.org
On 11 Mar 2008, at 14:18, Ivan Herman wrote: [snip] > I would very much favour of having a turtle version, too. It is > widely used in the community and, mainly for a primer, the > readability of the example in Turtle is a major plus. FWIW, in case it wasn't clear, I'd like to remind folks that there is nothing special about the current set of syntaxes in the primer. We're not even at FPWD and we always (at least I always) said that close to arbitrary syntaxes in informative work is a *desirable* goal (although as we get above a certain number we do need some interface tweakage). Indeed, ultimately, I'd like to make the examples entirely generated from a single source so that future syntaxes can be accomodated or people can publish their own favored one. (E.g., there are several controlled natural language syntaxes for OWL...it would be a great way to help get people into them if they could use Ye Old Familiar Primer to demonstrate them.) (Letting people do this might requires some modification to the W3C document license for the primer...) Until we get an automated hookup to the owl api (or some similar translator), I'm not going to work on additional or alternative syntaxes (and I'm certainly not going to work on the automated hookup before the f2f)...there's tons of work to be done on the text of the primer still (we're not feature complete; heading toward feature completion has revealed flaws that necessitate a fair bit of revision (no surprise! first draft and all); I'm not thrilled with the example; etc. etc.; cross linking is not even really begun....) Of course, if someone wants to do that work, that would be great. OTOH, I'd personally recommend waiting until the mechanical system is set up (though if folks wanted to work on *that* that would rock). (Also, I think it would be good to get a mode back where you can have the tabs....I liked that way of interacting....) Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Tuesday, 11 March 2008 14:38:45 UTC