www-webont-wg@w3.org from July 2003 by subject

"ObjectProperty" and "DatatypeProperty"

2 CfP: KCAP 03 Markup and Annotation Workshop

[Fwd: Question on OWL Lite]

[moved] Re: Proposal to request Candidate Recommendation

A couple more comments

ADMIN: Status of Comments - 7/15

ADMIN: VOTING DETAILS FOR CR DECISION

ADMIN: VOTING DETAILS FOR CR DECISION [Proxy]

ADMIN; REMINDER - NO TELECON THIS WEEK

Agenda and Logistics July 24 telecon -- CR vote expected

Agenda update (was Re: Agenda/Logistics for July 3 telecon)

Agenda/Logistics for July 3 telecon

Agenda/Logistics for July 3 telecon--regrets

All messages answered

Answering Ken Laskey (incl. proposal w/respect to AllDisjoint)

belated regrets: telecon 7/31

belated regrets: telecon of 7/17/03

CALL FOR PAPERS: Workshop on Regulatory Ontologies..

CR request is submitted

daml:item - still confused

Dave Reynold's comment - dataranges

Dave Reynold's message - bNodes as object in multiple triples

Deborah L. McGuiness in Guide?

distinctMembers in OWL Full undefined.

draft minutes from July 24 telecon

Draft response to Bernard Vatant

examples entailment questions

Fwd: Announcement: New Process Document Operative

Fwd: FYI: homepage for editors

Fwd: RDF XMLLiterals reagle-01,-02

helping folks read the OWL schema

Humo(u)r -- OWL Acronyms

I vote for moving to CR (was: RE: ADMIN: VOTING DETAILS FOR CR DECISION)

ill-formed lists in OWL Full

IMPORTANT - ADMIN: DETAILS FOR JULY 23 TELECON (and my regrets)

IMPORTANT Agenda Amendments

ISSUE 5.3 some of the HP discussions

ISSUE 5.3, a non-mon example

issue list sick?

issues with respect to the test cases overall manifest document

Jeremy Carroll response to 'Next step for OWL - are we ready to move to Candidate and/or Proposed Recommendation'

Jonathan Borden response to 'Next step for OWL - are we ready to move to Candidate and/or Proposed Recommendation'

Jos De Roo response to 'Next step for OWL - are we ready to move to Candidate and/or Proposed Recommendation'

Layering bug

Layering bug?

Link to Editor's Draft of Use Cases and Requirements

list archive updates on hold

Mike Dean response to 'Next step for OWL - are we ready to move to Candidate and/or Proposed Recommendation'

Minutes fix

Minutes of the beer session

mitre votes for moving to CR

Modeling issues and guidelines?

modified action

More OWL test passers

my review of the July 15 draft of RDF Semantics

Need someone to answer new comment

new reply to comments by Bijan Parsia

new version of S&AS in response to changes to RDF model theory

New WG member - introduction

no explicit type on bnodes

optional list typing (was Re: Proposal to request Candidate Recommendation)

Outstanding comments

Overview document now contains references section

Overview doesn't cite use cases and requirements

OWL guide problem?

owl:Thing and owl:Nothing

patrick hayes response to 'Next step for OWL - are we ready to move to Candidate and/or Proposed Recommendation'

pls elaborate citations in OWL Overview

possible regrets, Re: Proposal to request Candidate Recommendation

Potential Regrets for Today's Telecon

PR/CR Page

probable regrets

probable regrets telecon 3 July

procedural problems with Test last call

Proposal to Close issue 5.3, Semantic Layering

Proposal to request Candidate Recommendation

Proposed (parital) response to Ken Laskey and questions for WG

Proposed QA Reply (version 2)

Proposed response on daml:item

Proposed response to Bob MacGregor on Keys

Proposed response to Dave Reynolds - questions from HP

Proposed response to Dave Reynolds on dataranges

Proposed response to Gary Ng http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Jul/0014.ht ml

Proposed response to Gary Ng http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Jul/0014.html

Proposed response to Ken Laskey

Proposed response to: Unspecified domain,range in App. C of OWL Language Reference

Proposed Test: oneof/inverse

Protege OWL plugin

RDFCore changed rdfs:subClassOf from iff to if

RDFCore Comments on OWL Reference

regerets until Aug 4

regrest for 7/10/2003

Regrets

Regrets 10th July

regrets 24 July due to TAG ftf

Regrets August 7

regrets for 3 weeks

regrets for two telecons

Regrets July 24 and August 7th teklecom

regrets today

Regrets, 10th July Telecon

regrets, maybe.

regrets: 7/3 telecon

Regrets: Jul 10 telecon

Review of QA test guidelines

review of S&AS and 5.3

review of wine.owl and food.owl

review of wine.owl and food.owl (attn Sandro, Dan, Jos)

Revisiting AllDisjoint (was Proposed (parital) response to Ken Laskey and questions for WG)

Revisiting structured datatypes was: Re: Revisiting AllDisjoint (was Proposed (parital) response to Ken Laskey and questions for WG)

sameIndividualAs

small error in S&AS

specifying minimal datatypes without reference to "OWL Tools"

Telecon Regrets

Test approvals

Test ontologies

Test ontologies + forgotten attachment

TEST: 1 of 7 : document updated - intro

TEST: 2 of 7 : issue 5.3

TEST: 3 of 7 : RDFS changed semantics of rdfs:subClassOf

TEST: 4 of 7: was: Need a test -- inverse and oneOf

TEST: 5 of 7: was Re: Revisiting AllDisjoint

TEST: 6 of 7: empty universe example,

TEST: 7 of 7: unionOf and the Patel-Schneider paradox

TEST: sameAs I4.6-001 and I4.6-002 obsoleted

TEST: update of testresults

Tests illustrating structure sharing

thanks to all

Unanswered comment?

Update of spread sheet

Update on closed issue status

update on I18N review of RDF, OWL

Withdrawing HP's objection to OWL DL Syntax

WOWG - New version of CR request

WOWG: agenda Jul 10 telecon (provisional)

WOWG: agenda Jul 10 telecon (revised)

WOWG: minutes Jul 10 telecon

WOWG: Move to CR/PR - heads up and press release?

WOWG: We need your results on the Tests

WOWG: WEB-BASED STRAWPOLL on next steps - have your "vote" count

XSD datatypes anchor

your request to reopen 5.26

your request to reopen 5.26 (was Re: Minutes of the beer session)

Last message date: Thursday, 31 July 2003 14:41:53 UTC