At 10:21 PM +0200 7/10/03, Jos De_Roo wrote: >[...] > > >> > 22. RDFCore Comments on OWL Reference >> > ACTION: Frank van Harmelen to respond to one open element (rdfs:Class >> > vs. owl:Class) >> >> WITHDRAWN; transferred to PatH >> >> ACTION PatH: draft rationale for rdfs:Class vs. owl:Class situation >> (less controversial than last time) > >I was joining late and missed the disicussion; my bad >What I was also trying to say at the end of the telecon >(but had no chance due to sound prloblems) was that >I am stuck at the following: > >When D is a consistent OWL Lite/DL document then >it is not necessarily a consistent OWL Full document > >for example the document > >owl:Thing owl:oneOf _:x. >_:x rdf:first eg:a. >_:x rdf:rest _:y. >_:y rdf:first eg:b. >_:y rdf:rest rdf:nil. > >seems to be DL consistent but Full inconsistent. > >We try to make our assumptions explicit in a "global" sense >(using URI's, triples, implications and some such) >and I can't see those for owl:Class and owl:Thing >(seems to me that everybody could mean it's own local thing) Jos et al - I'm a bit confused on the issue of full inconsistent, in part because I haven't been tracking the RDF Core semantics -- supposing I did the following in RDF rdf:resource rdf:type eg:a. or - suppose I said: rdf:resource owl:equivalentTo owl:nothing. these would surely cause problems as well, wouldn't they? They seem to be syntactically legal RDF - does the semantics rule them out in some way? If not, wouldn't our documents where we change owl:Thing (in Full) be he equivalent of changing rdf:resource since they are equivalent? Guess what I'm really asking what "Full inconsistent" means in this sort of case... -JH -- Professor James Hendler hendler@cs.umd.edu Director, Semantic Web and Agent Technologies 301-405-2696 Maryland Information and Network Dynamics Lab. 301-405-6707 (Fax) Univ of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 *** 240-277-3388 (Cell) http://www.cs.umd.edu/users/hendler *** NOTE CHANGED CELL NUMBER ***Received on Friday, 11 July 2003 17:54:04 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:01 GMT