- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 30 Jul 2003 09:30:31 -0500
- To: www-webont-wg@w3.org
This still seems to be outstanding. I'm not sure whether it's reasonable to request CR without doing this first. Opinions? Volunteers? On Tue, 2003-07-15 at 10:54, Dan Connolly wrote: > I was going to cite the owl overview > as a starting point into the OWL specs; > I briefly double-checked that it cites > all the others... > > I was suprised to find that it doesn't > cite them in the traditional bibliographic sense. > http://www.w3.org/2001/06/manual/#ref-section > > They are linked from the roadmap section... > http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/#s1.1 > http://www.cs.vu.nl/~frankh/spool/OWLOverview.htm#s1.1 > > but could we please have bibliographic citations > as well? -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ office: tel:+1-617-395-0241 (new VoIP phone Mar 2003) mobile: tel:+1-816-616-6576 mobile: mailto:connolly+pager@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 30 July 2003 10:30:32 UTC