W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > July 2003

RE: helping folks read the OWL schema

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 11:15:03 +0200
To: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, <www-webont-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BHEGLCKMOHGLGNOKPGHDEENCCBAA.jjc@hpl.hp.com>


I had understood that we did not have comments in owl.rdf because of logical
worries of some members of the group ... (i.e. that the rdfs:comment fields
are not normatively true).

This would also hold for a rdfs:seeAlso or a dc:source

I am neutral.

It would be possible to use an XML comment without these problems.

Jeremy


> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-webont-wg-request@w3.org
> [mailto:www-webont-wg-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Dan Connolly
> Sent: 18 July 2003 19:35
> To: www-webont-wg@w3.org
> Subject: helping folks read the OWL schema
>
>
>
> Mike,
>
> In case somebody finds an OWL document
> and follows the namespace pointer to get
> clues about the terms,
> could you please add a pointer to the OWL
> specs from the OWL schema? use rdfs:seeAlso
> or dc:source or some such.
>
> Also, In order to make it
>   http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl
> more readable, I suggest adding
> a stylesheet link:
>
> <?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.w3.org/2002/06/rdfs2html.xsl"
> type="application/xml"?>
>
> For some examples of how this works, see
>   http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/pim/email
>   http://www.w3.org/2002/01/bookmark
>   http://www.w3.org/2001/02pd/rec54
>
> --
> Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
>
>
Received on Monday, 21 July 2003 05:18:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:01 GMT