- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 19:20:07 +0300
- To: www-webont-wg@w3.org
Ian, Jim, Jonathan I have include Ian's test from http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Jul/0157 as http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/editors-draft/draft/proposedByIssue#I5.21-002 I could do with a few more reptile names. I currently have 6 (taken from Jim's message) The number of triples in Ian's idiom is 6 + 5N = 36 The number of triples in the O(N^2) version is N(N+1)/2 = 21 If we had N=11 (another five reptiles) we would have 61 verses 66 triples, showing that Ian's idiom is better (with N>=11). Jeremy
Received on Wednesday, 23 July 2003 13:20:26 UTC