Re: RDFCore Comments on OWL Reference

In
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Jun/0011.html

Guus says:
[[
  > #owlref-rdfcore-owl-class-denotation
  >
  > It has been suggested to RDFCore that owl:Class is not needed.
  > RDFCore requests the creation of test cases to clearly illustrate the
  > differences between owl:Class and rdfs:Class.

This will be handled in a separate response.
]]

I am having trouble finding it ...

thanks for any pointers

Jeremy

Received on Wednesday, 23 July 2003 10:46:56 UTC