W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > July 2003

Re: RDFCore Comments on OWL Reference

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 16:46:28 +0300
To: www-webont-wg@w3.org
Cc: bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
Message-Id: <200307231646.28684.jjc@hpl.hp.com>



In
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Jun/0011.html

Guus says:
[[
  > #owlref-rdfcore-owl-class-denotation
  >
  > It has been suggested to RDFCore that owl:Class is not needed.
  > RDFCore requests the creation of test cases to clearly illustrate the
  > differences between owl:Class and rdfs:Class.

This will be handled in a separate response.
]]

I am having trouble finding it ...

thanks for any pointers

Jeremy
Received on Wednesday, 23 July 2003 10:46:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:01 GMT