- From: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>
- Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 10:33:22 -0400
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, www-webont-wg@w3.org
At 9:25 AM -0500 7/1/03, Dan Connolly wrote: >Hmm... I gather Peter is travelling. > >Meanwhile, I'd be interested to know if anybody >else agrees or disagrees that this is an improvement... > >On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 09:37, Dan Connolly wrote: >> Prompted by Martin's I18N questions, I found... >> >> "OWL tools need only implement the datatypes xsd:integer and >> xsd:string." >> -- >> http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-semantics/syntax.html#owl_built_in_datatypes >> >> What's an "OWL tool"? Let's specify the language >> without reference to software. >> >> In 3.1. Vocabularies and Interpretations, >> please change the defintion of datatype theory >> and/or Abstract OWL interpretation so that >> integer and string have to be included in the >> set of datatypes for every Abstract OWL interpretation. >> >> And change OWL interpretation in 5.2. OWL Interpretations >> likewise. >> >> Then strike the "OWL tools..." bit in >> section 2. Abstract Syntax. > >-- >Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ In my own opinion, I think what you suggest is an improvement. -- Professor James Hendler hendler@cs.umd.edu Director, Semantic Web and Agent Technologies 301-405-2696 Maryland Information and Network Dynamics Lab. 301-405-6707 (Fax) Univ of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 *** 240-277-3388 (Cell) http://www.cs.umd.edu/users/hendler *** NOTE CHANGED CELL NUMBER ***
Received on Tuesday, 1 July 2003 10:33:28 UTC