Re: TEST: 5 of 7: was Re: Revisiting AllDisjoint

At 7:20 PM +0300 7/23/03, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
>Ian, Jim, Jonathan
>
>I have include Ian's test from
>
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Jul/0157
>
>as
>
>http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/editors-draft/draft/proposedByIssue#I5.21-002
>
>I could do with a few more reptile names. I currently have 6 (taken from Jim's
>message)
>
>The number of triples in Ian's idiom is 6 + 5N = 36
>
>The number of triples in the O(N^2) version is N(N+1)/2 = 21
>
>If we had N=11 (another five reptiles) we would have 61 verses 66 triples,
>showing that Ian's idiom is better (with N>=11).
>
>
>Jeremy

Jeremy - the page http://www.embl-heidelberg.de/~uetz/families/taxa.html
contains more - just grab a few from there would be my suggestion.

This is a good idea for a tes t - thanks for asking.




-- 
Professor James Hendler				  hendler@cs.umd.edu
Director, Semantic Web and Agent Technologies	  301-405-2696
Maryland Information and Network Dynamics Lab.	  301-405-6707 (Fax)
Univ of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742	  *** 240-277-3388 (Cell)
http://www.cs.umd.edu/users/hendler      *** NOTE CHANGED CELL NUMBER ***