At 7:20 PM +0300 7/23/03, Jeremy Carroll wrote: >Ian, Jim, Jonathan > >I have include Ian's test from > >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Jul/0157 > >as > >http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/editors-draft/draft/proposedByIssue#I5.21-002 > >I could do with a few more reptile names. I currently have 6 (taken from Jim's >message) > >The number of triples in Ian's idiom is 6 + 5N = 36 > >The number of triples in the O(N^2) version is N(N+1)/2 = 21 > >If we had N=11 (another five reptiles) we would have 61 verses 66 triples, >showing that Ian's idiom is better (with N>=11). > > >Jeremy Jeremy - the page http://www.embl-heidelberg.de/~uetz/families/taxa.html contains more - just grab a few from there would be my suggestion. This is a good idea for a tes t - thanks for asking. -- Professor James Hendler hendler@cs.umd.edu Director, Semantic Web and Agent Technologies 301-405-2696 Maryland Information and Network Dynamics Lab. 301-405-6707 (Fax) Univ of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 *** 240-277-3388 (Cell) http://www.cs.umd.edu/users/hendler *** NOTE CHANGED CELL NUMBER ***Received on Wednesday, 23 July 2003 13:56:38 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:01 GMT