W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > July 2003

Re: RDFCore Comments on OWL Reference

From: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 12:44:18 -0400
Message-Id: <p05200f1ebb446aea4fe5@[10.0.1.3]>
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>, www-webont-wg@w3.org
Cc: bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com
At 4:46 PM +0300 7/23/03, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
>In
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webont-comments/2003Jun/0011.html
>
>Guus says:
>[[
>   > #owlref-rdfcore-owl-class-denotation
>   >
>   > It has been suggested to RDFCore that owl:Class is not needed.
>   > RDFCore requests the creation of test cases to clearly illustrate the
>   > differences between owl:Class and rdfs:Class.
>
>This will be handled in a separate response.
>]]
>
>I am having trouble finding it ...
>
>thanks for any pointers
>
>Jeremy

jeremy - good catch - Pat sent a proposed reply to our list [1] which 
was approved, but apparently never sent (and you and he then had a 
long email thread about it) - I missed that it hadn't gone out, and 
will send it today
  -JH




[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-webont-wg/2003Jun/0140.html



-- 
Professor James Hendler				  hendler@cs.umd.edu
Director, Semantic Web and Agent Technologies	  301-405-2696
Maryland Information and Network Dynamics Lab.	  301-405-6707 (Fax)
Univ of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742	  *** 240-277-3388 (Cell)
http://www.cs.umd.edu/users/hendler      *** NOTE CHANGED CELL NUMBER ***
Received on Wednesday, 23 July 2003 12:44:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:01 GMT