W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > July 2003

TEST: 2 of 7 : issue 5.3

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 19:19:46 +0300
To: www-webont-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <200307231919.46810.jjc@hpl.hp.com>


general interest? Ian, DanC, Jos

The updates for the change to the resolution of issue 5.3 are as follows:

New third para in section 3
http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/editors-draft/draft/#testTypes


[[
The metadata also indicates the language levels appropriate for each test and 
each document in each test. For each RDF/XML document, one language level is 
indicated, being OWL Lite, OWL DL or OWL Full, as given by the syntactic 
rules in [OWL Semantics and Abstract Syntax]. For semantic tests, one or two 
language levels are indicated. If the language level OWL Full is indicated 
for a semantic test, then the test holds according to the RDF-Compatible 
Model-Theoretic Semantics in [OWL Semantics and Abstract Syntax]. If the 
language level OWL Lite or OWL DL is indicated for a semantic test, then the 
test holds according to the Direct Model-Theoretic Semantics in [OWL 
Semantics and Abstract Syntax]. If the language level OWL Lite is indicated 
for a semantic test, then the test only uses features within the OWL Lite 
sublanguage. 
]]

4.1.2
http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/editors-draft/draft/#consistencyConformance

concerted the following from defining one concept 'consistent' to defining two 
concepts 'OWL DL consistent' and 'OWL Full consistent':
[[
 An OWL Lite or OWL DL document D is OWL DL consistent with respect to a 
datatype theory T if and only if there is some abstract OWL interpretation I 
with respect to T such that I satisfies an abstract ontology O equivalent to 
D, in which O has a separated vocabulary; (see [OWL Semantics and Abstract 
Syntax]). 

An OWL Full document D is OWL Full consistent with respect to a datatype 
theory T, if and only if there is some OWL Full interpretation I with respect 
to T such that I satisfies all the RDF graphs in some imports closed 
collection containing an RDF graph equivalent to D. 
]]

4.2.2
http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/editors-draft/draft/#consistencyChecker
added new para
[[
An OWL consistency checker MUST provide a means to determine the model theory 
[OWL Semantics and Abstract Syntax], it uses (either the Direct 
Model-Theoretic Semantics or the RDF-Compatible Model-Theoretic Semantics); 
for example, in its supporting documentation. 
]]


clarified which semantics each consistency checker should use
[[
An OWL Lite consistency checker is an OWL consistency checker that takes an 
OWL Lite document as input, and uses the Direct Model-Theoretic Semantics.

 An OWL DL consistency checker is an OWL consistency checker that takes an OWL 
DL document as input and uses the Direct Model-Theoretic Semantics. 

An OWL Full consistency checker is an OWL consistency checker that takes an 
OWL Full document as input and uses the RDF-Compatible Model-Theoretic 
Semantics. 
]]

modified note
[[
Note: An OWL Full consistency checker may indicate that an OWL DL document is 
inconsistent, while an OWL DL consistency checker indicates that the same 
document is consistent, (for example: compare test 
Thing-001 with Thing-002 or
compare AnnotationProperty-001> with <AnnotationProperty-002).
. Every OWL DL consistency checker is also an OWL Lite consistency checker. 
]]

section 5.2
http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/editors-draft/draft/#runningConsistencyChecker
Added to first para
[[
 The level of the test indicates the semantic theory being used, which may 
differ from the level of the file. For example, test Thing-001 contains an 
OWL DL file which is consistent as an OWL DL consistency test, but 
inconsistent as an OWL Full consistency test. 
]]

Deleted OWL DL or OWL Lite from the following ...
[[
An OWL Full consistency checker with appropriate datatype support, when 
presented with a file from an OWL Full, **OWL DL or OWL Lite** consistency 
test, must return Consistent or Unknown. 
]]

section 6
minor changes
http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/editors-draft/draft/#manifest
[[
The conformance levels associated with both files and tests are given with the 
otest:level property. The value for each document is one of otest:Full, 
otest:DL, otest:Lite or otest:Other. Each test is explicitly associated with 
one or two levels.
If it is associated with otest:Lite then it
is implicitly suitable for otest:DL.
]]

I also added the following tests (as actioned)
http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/editors-draft/draft/proposedByFunction#Thing-001
http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/editors-draft/draft/proposedByFunction#Thing-002
http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/editors-draft/draft/proposedByFunction#AnnotationProperty-001
http://www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/editors-draft/draft/proposedByFunction#AnnotationProperty-002
Received on Wednesday, 23 July 2003 13:20:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:01 GMT