- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 07:25:16 +0300
- To: www-webont-wg@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/rqim.html [[ Unfortunately, the proposal offered by Jeremy and the others could not be shown to be consistent with the correspondence proof of Appendix A of the OWL Semantics and Abstract Syntax document ]] is an untrue statement. [[ We received 74 comments in all. Of these we have answered and been acknowledged on 63 messages. For 11 more we have not received acknowledgements yet - on 9 of these we agreed or mostly agreed with the comment raiser and made edits to our documents in response. One comment has not been answered to the commentor's satisfaction, and we address this below. ]] It should be clarified that a few commentors have not been given seven days to reply. (Well I guess they will have had by the time we get there but it is premature to have a CR vote before having given them time to reply). [[ integrate any changes to RDF Core specs ]] We have already integrated some of the changes that RDF Core have told us about, and not others. Either we should go to CR with their last published WDs or we should go with all the decisions they have informed us about. The current state is unsatisfactory in that it presents an unnecessarily moving target for implementors. Jeremy
Received on Wednesday, 23 July 2003 01:25:38 UTC