W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > July 2003

Re: Proposal to request Candidate Recommendation

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 19:30:29 +0300
To: www-webont-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <200307231930.29039.jjc@hpl.hp.com>


>>We have already integrated some of the changes that RDF Core have told us
>>about, and not others. Either we should go to CR with their last published
>>WDs or we should go with all the decisions they have informed us about.
>>The current state is unsatisfactory in that it presents an unnecessarily
>>moving target for implementors.

>But there is no way to resolve except for us to wait until they move 
>to PR, which would mean we sit around for a month doing nothing.

I tend to agree that it is better to move to CR than sit around waiting for 
RDFCore to get to PR.

A specific issue I had in mind was that of "_:x rdf:type rdf:List", which is 
still obligatory in S&AS (for OWL DL).
The latest editors draft of Test has the interesting discrepancy that the 
triples are generated accordfing to the latest editors draft of RDF Syntax 
(without these type triples), and so many of the DL tests get flagged as in 
error - technically they are.

Jeremy
Received on Wednesday, 23 July 2003 13:30:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:01 GMT