W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-webont-wg@w3.org > July 2003

Re: Proposed (parital) response to Ken Laskey and questions for WG

From: Jim Hendler <hendler@cs.umd.edu>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 12:47:42 -0400
Message-Id: <p05200f1abb3b2aa2c80e@[10.0.1.3]>
To: Jeff Heflin <heflin@cse.lehigh.edu>
Cc: WebOnt <www-webont-wg@w3.org>

At 10:15 AM -0400 7/16/03, Jeff Heflin wrote:
>Jim,
>
>Point taken. I also prefer  your second suggestion (i.e., change
>"typically" to "assumed to be".
>
>Before I send the message I'd like to see if the WG has a preference on
>whether or not we need to include some discussion of how OWL meets our
>requirements somewhere in our document set. This was a theme that ran
>throughout Ken's post.
>
>Jeff
>

I sort of like this idea - What about if we had an appendix to the 
reqs document that directed people to the appropriate document parts 
-- that way it wouldn't require a lot of new text?  Could be a table 
like  (these are random - not tracking the real things):

O1	"Realized via mapping to RDF"		http://sas/
O2	"Issue raised, but postponed"		http://issues...
...
R1	"Realized via mapping to RDF"		http://ref/...
R2	"see owl:sameAs"			http://guide/...
-- 
Professor James Hendler				  hendler@cs.umd.edu
Director, Semantic Web and Agent Technologies	  301-405-2696
Maryland Information and Network Dynamics Lab.	  301-405-6707 (Fax)
Univ of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742	  *** 240-277-3388 (Cell)
http://www.cs.umd.edu/users/hendler      *** NOTE CHANGED CELL NUMBER ***
Received on Wednesday, 16 July 2003 13:52:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:01 GMT