public-lod@w3.org from November 2010 by author

A.Nikolov

• class level mappings inferred from BTC2009 data (Tuesday, 9 November)

Adrian Walker

• Re: Tabulator? Re: More browsers for ISWC 2010 data? (Monday, 8 November)

Alan Ruttenberg

• Re: survey: who uses the triple foaf:name rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:label? (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: clarification on the use of fragments (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: clarification on the use of fragments (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: Model Semantics, Representation Syntax, and Systems Integration (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: clarification on the use of fragments (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: Model Semantics, Representation Syntax, and Systems Integration (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: Model Semantics, Representation Syntax, and Systems Integration (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: Integrating Disparate Information Systems (Wednesday, 10 November)

Aldo Bucchi

• Re: FW: Failed to port datastore to RDF, will go Mongo (Wednesday, 24 November)
• Re: FW: Failed to port datastore to RDF, will go Mongo (Wednesday, 24 November)
• Re: Making Linked Data Fun (Friday, 19 November)
• Re: Making Linked Data Fun (Friday, 19 November)

Angelo Veltens

• Re: Linked Data Thesaurus online (Tuesday, 16 November)
• Linked Data Thesaurus online (was: Re: synonym / thesaurus data) (Friday, 12 November)

Antoine Zimmermann

• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work: But maybe it can be simpler? (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work: But maybe it can be simpler? (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary - demo (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary - demo (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary - demo (Friday, 5 November)

Axel Ngonga

• LIMES (Friday, 12 November)

Barry Norton

• Re: Possible Idea For a Sem Web Based Game? (Sunday, 21 November)

Ben O'Steen

• Re: FW: Failed to port datastore to RDF, will go Mongo (Wednesday, 24 November)
• Re: FW: Failed to port datastore to RDF, will go Mongo (Wednesday, 24 November)

Bernard Vatant

• Re: Looking for metalex ontology (Tuesday, 30 November)
• Looking for metalex ontology (Monday, 29 November)
• Re: survey: who uses the triple foaf:name rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:label? (Friday, 12 November)

Bernhard Schandl

• Open Positions at Gnowsis.com (Friday, 12 November)

Bill Roberts

• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work (Sunday, 7 November)
• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work (Saturday, 6 November)

bill.roberts@planet.nl

• RE: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates (Friday, 5 November)
• RE: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) (Friday, 5 November)
• RE: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 4 November)

Bob Ferris

• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Friday, 26 November)

Bradley Allen

• Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200 (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200 (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200 (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200 (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200 (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200 (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200 (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Fwd: Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 4 November)

Christian Rivas

• Re: RDB to RDF & ontology terms reuse (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: RDB to RDF & ontology terms reuse (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: RDB to RDF & ontology terms reuse (Friday, 5 November)
• RDB to RDF & ontology terms reuse (Friday, 5 November)
• RDB to RDF & ontology terms reuse (Friday, 5 November)

Christopher Brewster

• Full-time PhD studentship in Semantic Web and Linked Data (Friday, 12 November)

Damian Steer

• Linked Data Hackdays, Bristol, 13-14 January, 2011 (Monday, 29 November)
• Re: Possible Idea For a Sem Web Based Game? (Sunday, 21 November)

Dan Brickley

• survey: who uses the triple foaf:name rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:label? (Friday, 12 November)

Dave Reynolds

• Re: Failed to port datastore to RDF, will go Mongo (Thursday, 25 November)
• Re: data.gov.uk ontologies (Wednesday, 17 November)
• Re: data.gov.uk ontologies (Tuesday, 16 November)
• Re: What is a URL? And What is a URI (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: [Request for Input] Linked Data Specifications (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates (Friday, 5 November)

David Booth

• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Friday, 26 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Friday, 26 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Friday, 19 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 18 November)
• Re: Role of URI and HTTP in Linked Data (Wednesday, 17 November)
• Re: Role of URI and HTTP in Linked Data (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (dealing with ambiguity) (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (dealing with ambiguity) (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Multiple things described in a single document) (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Saturday, 6 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 4 November)

David Huynh

• Re: Google Refine 2.0 (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: Google Refine 2.0 (Friday, 12 November)
• Google Refine 2.0 (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: Google Refine 2.0 (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: Google Refine 2.0 (Thursday, 11 November)

David Wood

• Re: A(nother) Guide to Publishing Linked Data Without Redirects (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: A(nother) Guide to Publishing Linked Data Without Redirects (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: A(nother) Guide to Publishing Linked Data Without Redirects (Thursday, 11 November)
• A(nother) Guide to Publishing Linked Data Without Redirects (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary - demo (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: [Request for Input] Linked Data Specifications (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary - demo (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 4 November)

Deliot, Corine

• RE: [open-bibliography] ANN: British National Bibliography (Monday, 22 November)

Denny Vrandecic

• Re: More browsers for ISWC 2010 data? (Monday, 8 November)

dfhuynh@csail.mit.edu

• Re: Google Refine 2.0 (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: Google Refine 2.0 (Thursday, 11 November)

Egon Willighagen

• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates (Sunday, 7 November)
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates (Friday, 5 November)

Francisco Javier López Pellicer

• Re: Breaking News: Google supports GoodRelations (Wednesday, 3 November)

Friedrich Lindenberg

• Re: Failed to port datastore to RDF, will go Mongo (Wednesday, 24 November)

Giovanni Tummarello

• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Sunday, 28 November)
• Re: survey: who uses the triple foaf:name rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:label? (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: A(nother) Guide to Publishing Linked Data Without Redirects (Thursday, 11 November)
• 200 OK with Content-Location might work: But maybe it can be simpler? (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary - demo (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 4 November)

Gong Cheng

• RE: survey: who uses the triple foaf:name rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:label? (Friday, 12 November)

Harry Halpin

• Re: A(nother) Guide to Publishing Linked Data Without Redirects (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 4 November)

Henry Story

• Re: Semantic Ambiguity (Friday, 12 November)

Hugh Glaser

• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 4 November)

Ian Davis

• Re: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: Publishing Linked Data without Redirects (Monday, 8 November)
• Publishing Linked Data without Redirects (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work (Sunday, 7 November)
• Re: Hash vs Slash in relation to the 303 vs 200 debate (was: Is 303 really necessary - demo) (Sunday, 7 November)
• Hash vs Slash in relation to the 303 vs 200 debate (was: Is 303 really necessary - demo) (Saturday, 6 November)
• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work (Saturday, 6 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary - demo (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary - demo (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Friday, 5 November)
• Is 303 really necessary - demo (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 4 November)
• Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 4 November)

Iker Huerga

• Re: Is 303 really necessary - demo (Friday, 5 November)

James Leigh

• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Monday, 29 November)
• Re: Inferring data from network interactions (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) (Friday, 5 November)

Jason Borro

• Is disambiguation really necessary? (was Is 303 really necessary?) (Thursday, 11 November)

Jie Bao

• Re: linked data about the W3C? (Wednesday, 24 November)
• Re: More browsers for ISWC 2010 data? (Monday, 8 November)
• More browsers for ISWC 2010 data? (Sunday, 7 November)
• Visual Backchannel for ISWC 2010 (Twitter Visualization) (Saturday, 6 November)
• ISWC 2010 metadata is online (Wednesday, 3 November)

Jiří Procházka

• Re: Simpler alternative of Linked Data semantics (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) (Monday, 29 November)
• Simpler alternative of Linked Data semantics (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) (Sunday, 28 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Sunday, 28 November)
• Re: Role of URI and HTTP in Linked Data (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: Role of URI and HTTP in Linked Data (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Role of URI and HTTP in Linked Data (Wednesday, 10 November)

Joana Hois

• CfP: Applied Ontology Special Issue on Modularity in Ontologies (Wednesday, 24 November)

joel sachs

• Re: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) (Tuesday, 9 November)

John Erickson

• Re: Making Linked Data Fun (Friday, 19 November)

John Sheridan

• Re: Google Refine 2.0 (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: Google Refine 2.0 (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work (Sunday, 7 November)
• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work (Sunday, 7 November)
• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work (Sunday, 7 November)

Juan Sequeda

• Re: FW: Failed to port datastore to RDF, will go Mongo (Wednesday, 24 November)
• Re: A Direct Mapping of Relational Data to RDF (Friday, 19 November)
• A Direct Mapping of Relational Data to RDF (Thursday, 18 November)
• Re: Breaking News: Google supports GoodRelations (Tuesday, 2 November)

Jörn Hees

• Re: [foaf-dev] EON - event of note (Sunday, 7 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary - demo (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary - demo (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary - demo (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 4 November)

KangHao Lu (Kenny)

• Re: Google Refine 2.0 (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: survey: who uses the triple foaf:name rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:label? (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: survey: who uses the triple foaf:name rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:label? (Friday, 12 November)

Karl Dubost

• Re: linked data about the W3C? (Wednesday, 24 November)
• Re: linked data about the W3C? (Wednesday, 24 November)

Kingsley Idehen

• Re: Simpler alternative of Linked Data semantics (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) (Monday, 29 November)
• Re: Simpler alternative of Linked Data semantics (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) (Sunday, 28 November)
• Re: SPARQL Web Pages (aka UISPIN) (Sunday, 28 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Sunday, 28 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Saturday, 27 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Friday, 26 November)
• Re: Failed to port datastore to RDF, will go Mongo (Thursday, 25 November)
• Re: FW: Failed to port datastore to RDF, will go Mongo (Wednesday, 24 November)
• Re: FW: Failed to port datastore to RDF, will go Mongo (Wednesday, 24 November)
• Re: linked data about the W3C? (Wednesday, 24 November)
• Re: FW: Failed to port datastore to RDF, will go Mongo (Wednesday, 24 November)
• Re: FW: Failed to port datastore to RDF, will go Mongo (Wednesday, 24 November)
• Re: ANN: British National Bibliography (Monday, 22 November)
• Re: Making Linked Data Fun (Monday, 22 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Saturday, 20 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Friday, 19 November)
• Re: AW: Making Linked Data Fun (Friday, 19 November)
• Re: Making Linked Data Fun (Friday, 19 November)
• Making Linked Data Fun (Friday, 19 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Friday, 19 November)
• Re: Ookaboo does #it (Tuesday, 16 November)
• Re: What is a URL? And What is a URI (Saturday, 13 November)
• Re: What is a URL? And What is a URI (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: Google Refine 2.0 (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200 (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200 (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200 (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: Semantic Ambiguity (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: What is a URL? And What is a URI (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: Google Refine 2.0 (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: Google Refine 2.0 (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200 (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: What is a URL? And What is a URI (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: What is a URL? And What is a URI (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: [ontolog-forum] Model Semantics, Representation Syntax, and Systems Integration (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: [ontolog-forum] Model Semantics, Representation Syntax, and Systems Integration (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: Role of URI and HTTP in Linked Data (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: Google Refine 2.0 (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: What is a URL? And What is a URI (Thursday, 11 November)
• What is a URL? And What is a URI (Thursday, 11 November)
• Rough draft poem: Document what art thou? (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: Role of URI and HTTP in Linked Data (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: Google Refine 2.0 (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: Role of URI and HTTP in Linked Data (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: Role of URI and HTTP in Linked Data (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: A(nother) Guide to Publishing Linked Data Without Redirects (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: A(nother) Guide to Publishing Linked Data Without Redirects (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: A(nother) Guide to Publishing Linked Data Without Redirects (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: Model Semantics, Representation Syntax, and Systems Integration (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200 (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: Model Semantics, Representation Syntax, and Systems Integration (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200 (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: Model Semantics, Representation Syntax, and Systems Integration (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Model Semantics, Representation Syntax, and Systems Integration (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Integrating Disparate Information Systems (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) (Tuesday, 9 November)
• What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work (Sunday, 7 November)
• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work (Sunday, 7 November)
• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work (Sunday, 7 November)
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates (Sunday, 7 November)
• Re: wdrs:describedby (Saturday, 6 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Saturday, 6 November)
• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work (Saturday, 6 November)
• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work (Saturday, 6 November)
• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work (Saturday, 6 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary - demo (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: wdrs Error (was Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates) (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: WebID and Signed Emails (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: [Request for Input] Linked Data Specifications (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates (Friday, 5 November)
• isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: WebID and Signed Emails (Thursday, 4 November)
• WebID and Signed Emails (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 4 November)

Kjetil Kjernsmo

• Re: A(nother) Guide to Publishing Linked Data Without Redirects (Wednesday, 17 November)
• Linked Open Data Hackathon in Oslo, Norway (Wednesday, 17 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Wednesday, 10 November)

Lars Heuer

• Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200 (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200 (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200 (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200 (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200 (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200 (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200 (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Monday, 8 November)

Leigh Dodds

• Re: Possible Idea For a Sem Web Based Game? (Monday, 22 November)
• Re: Google Refine 2.0 (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: Google Refine 2.0 (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: RDB to RDF & ontology terms reuse (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary - demo (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary - demo (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) (Friday, 5 November)
• Inferring data from network interactions (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) (Friday, 5 November)
• What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 4 November)

Maali, Fadi

• RDF Extension for Google Refine (Monday, 29 November)

Malte Kiesel

• DBTropes.org, more sameAs links (Monday, 29 November)

Martin Hepp

• ANN: The Tickets Ontology for Concerts, Airfare, Museums, etc. (Tuesday, 16 November)
• Breaking News: Google supports GoodRelations (Tuesday, 2 November)

Melvin Carvalho

• Re: Possible Idea For a Sem Web Based Game? (Sunday, 21 November)
• Re: Possible Idea For a Sem Web Based Game? (Sunday, 21 November)
• Re: Possible Idea For a Sem Web Based Game? (Sunday, 21 November)
• Re: Possible Idea For a Sem Web Based Game? (Sunday, 21 November)
• Re: Possible Idea For a Sem Web Based Game? (Sunday, 21 November)
• Re: Possible Idea For a Sem Web Based Game? (Saturday, 20 November)
• Re: Possible Idea For a Sem Web Based Game? (Saturday, 20 November)
• Possible Idea For a Sem Web Based Game? (Saturday, 20 November)
• Re: WebID and Signed Emails (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: Breaking News: Google supports GoodRelations (Tuesday, 2 November)

Michael Hausenblas

• Re: linked data about the W3C? (Wednesday, 24 November)
• Re: [Request for Input] Linked Data Specifications (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: [Request for Input] Linked Data Specifications (Friday, 5 November)
• [Request for Input] Linked Data Specifications (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Friday, 5 November)

Michael Schneider

• RE: [foaf-dev] EON - event of note (Sunday, 7 November)

mike amundsen

• Re: Possible Idea For a Sem Web Based Game? (Sunday, 21 November)
• Re: Possible Idea For a Sem Web Based Game? (Sunday, 21 November)
• Re: Possible Idea For a Sem Web Based Game? (Saturday, 20 November)
• Re: Model Semantics, Representation Syntax, and Systems Integration (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: Model Semantics, Representation Syntax, and Systems Integration (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 4 November)

Mike Kelly

• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work: But maybe it can be simpler? (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary - demo (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary - demo (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary - demo (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary - demo (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 4 November)

Mischa Tuffield

• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: WebID and Signed Emails (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 4 November)

Nathan

• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Friday, 26 November)
• Re: Possible Idea For a Sem Web Based Game? (Saturday, 20 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Friday, 19 November)
• Re: Making Linked Data Fun (Friday, 19 November)
• Re: Rough draft poem: Document what art thou? (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: Role of URI and HTTP in Linked Data (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: A(nother) Guide to Publishing Linked Data Without Redirects (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: Role of URI and HTTP in Linked Data (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: Role of URI and HTTP in Linked Data (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: clarification on the use of fragments (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: clarification on the use of fragments (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: Role of URI and HTTP in Linked Data (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200 (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: clarification on the use of fragments (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200 (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200 (Wednesday, 10 November)
• clarification on the use of fragments (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200 (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200 (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: Role of URI and HTTP in Linked Data (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: subjects as literals (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work (Saturday, 6 November)
• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work: But maybe it can be simpler? (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work: But maybe it can be simpler? (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work: But maybe it can be simpler? (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work: But maybe it can be simpler? (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary - demo (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work: But maybe it can be simpler? (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary - demo (Friday, 5 November)
• 200 OK with Content-Location might work (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary - demo (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary - demo (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary - demo (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary - demo (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Migrating from slash to fragment (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary - demo (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: [Request for Input] Linked Data Specifications (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: Breaking News: Google supports GoodRelations (Tuesday, 2 November)

Niklas Lindström

• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work (Sunday, 7 November)
• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work (Sunday, 7 November)

Norman Gray

• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Saturday, 6 November)
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Friday, 5 November)

Obrst, Leo J.

• Announcement: First IAOA Summer Institute in Applied Ontology, Tuscany, Italy, July 17-23, 2011 (Tuesday, 30 November)

Olaf Hartig

• Linked Data gathering today (Monday, 8 November)
• COLD2010 workshop program and data (Wednesday, 3 November)

Pat Hayes

• Re: Role of URI and HTTP in Linked Data (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: Role of URI and HTTP in Linked Data (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work: But maybe it can be simpler? (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Friday, 5 November)

Patrick Durusau

• Re: What is a URL? And What is a URI (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: What is a URL? And What is a URI (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: What is a URL? And What is a URI (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: What is a URL? And What is a URI (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 4 November)

Paul Houle

• Ookaboo does #it (Tuesday, 16 November)

Paul Michelotti

• Re: Possible Idea For a Sem Web Based Game? (Sunday, 21 November)

Percy Enrique Rivera Salas

• Re: data.gov.uk ontologies (Wednesday, 17 November)
• Re: data.gov.uk ontologies (Tuesday, 16 November)
• data.gov.uk ontologies (Monday, 15 November)
• data.gov.uk ontologies (Monday, 15 November)

Pete Johnston

• RE: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) (Tuesday, 9 November)

Peter DeVries

• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates (Monday, 8 November)

Peter Haase

• AW: Making Linked Data Fun (Friday, 19 November)

Peter Murray-Rust

• Re: [open-bibliography] ANN: British National Bibliography (Monday, 22 November)
• Re: [open-bibliography] ANN: British National Bibliography (Monday, 22 November)

Phil Archer

• wdrs:describedby = @rel describedby. Erratum published (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: Publishing Linked Data without Redirects (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work (Sunday, 7 November)
• POWDER Fix on wdrs:describedby (was Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work) (Saturday, 6 November)
• wdrs:describedby (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates (Friday, 5 November)
• wdrs Error (was Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates) (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates (Friday, 5 November)
• wdrs Error (was Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates) (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates (Friday, 5 November)

Pierre-Antoine Champin

• linked data about the W3C? (Wednesday, 24 November)

ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program

• Re: Looking for metalex ontology (Monday, 29 November)
• Re: Possible Idea For a Sem Web Based Game? (Sunday, 21 November)
• Financial Integrity Index proposal begs for linked data applications (Friday, 5 November)

Rajendra Akerkar

• One Week Countdown to submit for WIMS'11 Conference (Friday, 12 November)

Raphaël Troncy

• Re: [foaf-dev] EON - event of note (Monday, 8 November)

Richard Light

• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Saturday, 27 November)
• Re: [open-bibliography] ANN: British National Bibliography (Monday, 22 November)
• Re: [open-bibliography] ANN: British National Bibliography (Monday, 22 November)
• Re: [open-bibliography] ANN: British National Bibliography (Monday, 22 November)
• Re: ANN: British National Bibliography (Monday, 22 November)
• Re: A(nother) Guide to Publishing Linked Data Without Redirects (Thursday, 11 November)

Rinke Hoekstra

• Re: Looking for metalex ontology (Tuesday, 30 November)
• Reminder: JURIX 2010 Call for Participation (Tuesday, 16 November)

Robert C. Hsu

• Call for Contribution - Journals and Conferences (Saturday, 27 November)
• International Journal of Engineering and Industries (Tuesday, 2 November)

Robert Fuller

• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work: But maybe it can be simpler? (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary - demo (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary - demo (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 4 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 4 November)

Robert Sanderson

• Re: Role of URI and HTTP in Linked Data (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: [foaf-dev] EON - event of note (Sunday, 7 November)

Robin YANG

• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 4 November)

Sarven Capadisli

• Re: Making Linked Data Fun (Sunday, 21 November)

Susanne Thierfelder

• SAMT 2010 - CALL FOR PARTICIPATION (Thursday, 11 November)

Sören Auer

• CfP: Position Papers for Linked Data Session at Future Internet Assembly (Thursday, 25 November)
• 1st CfP: 11th International Conference on Web Engineering (ICWE 2011) (Monday, 15 November)

Ted Thibodeau Jr

• Re: RDB to RDF & ontology terms reuse (Thursday, 11 November)
• Re: RDB to RDF & ontology terms reuse (Wednesday, 10 November)

Thai, Vinhtuan

• Extended deadline IUI2011 Workshop: Visual Interfaces to the Social and Semantic Web (VISSW 2011) (Saturday, 6 November)

Tim Berners-Lee

• Re: Looking for metalex ontology (Monday, 29 November)
• Facebook OpenGraphProtocol (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) (Sunday, 28 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Saturday, 27 November)
• Re: linked data about the W3C? (Wednesday, 24 November)
• Re: Tabulator? Re: More browsers for ISWC 2010 data? (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Tabulator? Re: More browsers for ISWC 2010 data? (Monday, 8 November)

Toby Inkster

• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Sunday, 28 November)
• Re: Failed to port datastore to RDF, will go Mongo (Wednesday, 24 November)
• Re: Possible Idea For a Sem Web Based Game? (Sunday, 21 November)
• Re: Possible Idea For a Sem Web Based Game? (Sunday, 21 November)
• Re: Possible Idea For a Sem Web Based Game? (Sunday, 21 November)
• Re: Possible Idea For a Sem Web Based Game? (Sunday, 21 November)
• Re: Possible Idea For a Sem Web Based Game? (Saturday, 20 November)
• Re: Possible Idea For a Sem Web Based Game? (Saturday, 20 November)
• Re: survey: who uses the triple foaf:name rdfs:subPropertyOf rdfs:label? (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200 (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200 (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: Status codes / IR vs. NIR -- 303 vs. 200 (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?) (Wednesday, 10 November)
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: [foaf-dev] EON - event of note (Sunday, 7 November)
• Re: [foaf-dev] EON - event of note (Sunday, 7 November)
• Fw: [foaf-dev] EON - event of note (Saturday, 6 November)
• Re: Hash vs Slash in relation to the 303 vs 200 debate (was: Is 303 really necessary - demo) (Saturday, 6 November)

Tore Eriksson

• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (dealing with ambiguity) (Tuesday, 9 November)
• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (dealing with ambiguity) (Monday, 8 November)
• Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work (Monday, 8 November)

valentina presutti

• WOP 2010: Call for Participation (Wednesday, 3 November)
• WOP 2010: Call for Late Breaking News (Wednesday, 3 November)

Vasiliy Faronov

• Re: isDefinedBy and isDescribedBy, Tale of two missing predicates (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Breaking News: Google supports GoodRelations (Wednesday, 3 November)
• Re: Breaking News: Google supports GoodRelations (Wednesday, 3 November)

William Waites

• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Sunday, 28 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Friday, 26 November)
• Re: Failed to port datastore to RDF, will go Mongo (Wednesday, 24 November)
• Re: FW: Failed to port datastore to RDF, will go Mongo (Wednesday, 24 November)
• FW: Failed to port datastore to RDF, will go Mongo (Wednesday, 24 November)
• Re: [open-bibliography] ANN: British National Bibliography (Monday, 22 November)
• Re: [open-bibliography] ANN: British National Bibliography (Monday, 22 November)
• Re: ANN: British National Bibliography (Monday, 22 November)
• ANN: British National Bibliography (Monday, 22 November)
• Re: Possible Idea For a Sem Web Based Game? (Sunday, 21 November)
• Re: data.gov.uk ontologies (Tuesday, 16 November)
• Re: Semantic Ambiguity (Sunday, 14 November)
• Semantic Ambiguity (Friday, 12 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Friday, 5 November)
• Re: Is 303 really necessary? (Thursday, 4 November)

WIMS'11

• WIMS'11: Call for Papers (Deadline 20th NOV) (Monday, 1 November)

Xi Bai

• Re: Web Based RDFa Editor (Thursday, 4 November)

Last message date: Tuesday, 30 November 2010 18:19:05 UTC