On 11/5/10 11:12 AM, Ian Davis wrote: > On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Norman Gray<norman@astro.gla.ac.uk> wrote: >> httpRange-14 requires that a URI with a 200 response MUST be an IR; a URI with a 303 MAY be a NIR. >> >> Ian is (effectively) suggesting that a URI with a 200 response MAY be an IR, in the sense that it is defeasibly taken to be an IR, unless this is contradicted by a self-referring statement within the RDF obtained from the URI. > Thank you for writing this - it's exactly what I mean. > > Ian > > For everyone else: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defeasible_reasoning :-) -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen President& CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
Received on Friday, 5 November 2010 16:36:44 UTC