W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > November 2010

Re: Is 303 really necessary?

From: Nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 10:34:14 +0000
Message-ID: <4CD3DDA6.1040405@webr3.org>
To: Ian Davis <me@iandavis.com>
CC: Leigh Dodds <leigh.dodds@talis.com>, public-lod@w3.org
Ian Davis wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Nathan <nathan@webr3.org> wrote:
>> What's the point in you saying:
>>
>>  </toucan> a :Toucan; :describedBy </doc> .
>>
>> If the rest of the world is saying:
>>
>>  </toucan> a :Document; :primaryTopic ex:Toucan .
>>
>> Follow?
>>
> 
> Because the data obtained by dereferencing /toucan is authoratative?

wow, so if I give you give you a big dump of triples including:

   <http://iandavis.com/2010/303/toucan> a ex:Toucan .
   <http://iandavis.com/2010/303/toucan> :primaryTopic ex:Toucan .
   <http://iandavis.com/2010/303/toucan> a e:Document .
   <http://iandavis.com/2010/303/toucan> :isPrimaryTopicOf 
<http://iandavis.com/2010/303/doc> .

You can tell me which one's authorative?

and if I publish:

   <http://webr3.org/nathan#me> :isKingOf :TheWorld .

it's authorative and considered true?

great news all round :)
Received on Friday, 5 November 2010 10:35:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 31 March 2013 14:24:30 UTC