Re: 200 OK with Content-Location might work

On 6 Nov 2010, at 17:25, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
>> 
> All,
> 
> So we have arrived at a destination that's mutually inclusive re. 303 indirection. Basically, an additional technique that uses Content-Location as the switch. Nice, simple, clean, and shouldn't break a thing, as long as people stop producing "old school" RDF resources.
> 
> In addition, I think we've also triggered a POWDER fix that's been long overlooked.
>  

+1.

(just to clarify: what do you mean exactly by "old school" RDF resources?)

Received on Saturday, 6 November 2010 16:42:26 UTC