W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > November 2010

Re: Is 303 really necessary?

From: Lars Heuer <heuer@semagia.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 22:17:18 +0100
Message-ID: <107705452.20101108221718@semagia.com>
To: Ian Davis <me@iandavis.com>
CC: public-lod@w3.org
Hi Ian,

Even if I come from a slightly different camp (Topic Maps), I wonder
if your proposal hasn't become reality already. Try to resolve
rdf:type or rdfs:label: I think we agree that these resources describe
abstract concepts and should not return 200 but 303. Both return 200.

So, what we're talking about? The building bricks of RDF return 200
and everybody seems to happy with that fact. Why shouldn't other
(non-addressable) information resources return 200 as well?

Do I miss something?

Best regards,
Lars
-- 
Semagia 
<http://www.semagia.com>
Received on Tuesday, 9 November 2010 10:53:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 31 March 2013 14:24:30 UTC