W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > November 2010

Re: Is 303 really necessary?

From: Giovanni Tummarello <giovanni.tummarello@deri.org>
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 14:52:21 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTimWC-fvbbauD9x9sVj1D53ABMvkiXregBSFxizJ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
Cc: Ian Davis <lists@iandavis.com>, William Waites <ww@styx.org>, Richard Light <richard@light.demon.co.uk>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
> - the rest of the web continue to use 200
>
> Tim

yes but the rest of the web will use 200 also to show what we would
consider 208, e.g.

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/celebrity/antonio_banderas/

see the trilples
http://inspector.sindice.com/inspect?url=http://www.rottentomatoes.com/celebrity/antonio_banderas/#TRIPLES

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/celebrity/antonio_banderas/

is clearly a web page but its also an actor, it is pointed by their
graph in other pages as such and the same page contains the opengraph
triple  "type" "actor"

We should not get ourself in the position to have to try to evangelize
all to change something for reasons that are really not apparent to
your normal web world. I think the solution we should be seeking
consider RDFa publishing via normal 200 code as the example above
absolutely ok

an agent would then be able to distinguish which properties apply to
the "page" and which to the "actor" looking at the.. properties
themselves i guess?  sad but possibly unavoidable?

Giovanni
Received on Sunday, 28 November 2010 13:53:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:16:10 UTC