W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > November 2010

Re: What would break, a question for implementors? (was Re: Is 303 really necessary?)

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 17:22:47 -0500
Message-ID: <4CD9C9B7.6050609@openlinksw.com>
To: joel sachs <jsachs@csee.umbc.edu>
CC: nathan@webr3.org, Ian Davis <me@iandavis.com>, Pete Johnston <Pete.Johnston@eduserv.org.uk>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>
On 11/9/10 5:04 PM, joel sachs wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Nov 2010, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
>
>> On 11/9/10 11:10 AM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
>>>
>
>>
>> A URI is just an Identifier. We can't  "Describe" what isn't 
>> unambiguously Identified (Named);
>
> Kingsley,
>
> I think we can, though we might not be properly understood, e.g. 
> "Kingsley was great in Gandhi and Sexy Beast."

To whom is this unambiguous?

Kingsley

>
> Wasn't this part of the summer's argument regarding literals as 
> rdf:subjects , i.e.
>
> Those opposed: But you might be misunderstood.
> Those in favour: We'll take our chances.
> ?

>
> Joel.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> hence the use of "Names" since the beginning of shared cognition era 
>> re. human evolution.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>> -- 
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Kingsley Idehen    President&  CEO
>> OpenLink Software
>> Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
>> Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
>> Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>


-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
President&  CEO
OpenLink Software
Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
Received on Tuesday, 9 November 2010 22:23:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 31 March 2013 14:24:30 UTC