- From: Hugh Glaser <hg@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 17:50:23 +0000
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- CC: "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>
Thanks Kingsley. On 04/11/2010 23:43, "Kingsley Idehen" <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote: <big snip of very helpful analysis of why the http://www.uk-postcodes.com/postcode/AB101AA URI responses might be sub-optimal> > > To conclude, is this URL: > <http://www.uk-postcodes.com/postcode/AB101AA> ><http://www.uk-postcodes.com/postcode/AB101AA>, what you > regard as the best practice? Absolutely not! :-) The point I was trying to make in that bit of my message was that there are already URIs that are responding in this way out there in the wild (in our LOD Cloud, by the way), and perhaps it would be useful to give some guidance as to how to improve things if that is the route the publisher wants (or insists) to go. <more snip> Sorry, Stuart, not meaning to have a go at you here! It was just that, as the discussion started, your URIs happened to cross my screen for sameAs.org inclusion (all there now), and I usually have a quick check of these things before consuming. I could have used other URIs just as easily. Very best Hugh
Received on Friday, 5 November 2010 17:51:25 UTC