W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-lod@w3.org > November 2010

Re: Is 303 really necessary?

From: Leigh Dodds <leigh.dodds@talis.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 09:28:50 +0000
Message-ID: <AANLkTim02r_WgQ9+C-1GLcY_NMb1_8-=BXn-=a3-u14j@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Cc: Ian Davis <me@iandavis.com>, public-lod@w3.org
Hi,

On 4 November 2010 18:42, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote:
> Nobody ever mandated 303 redirection.

I've never encountered anyone in the community that has recently
advocated (i.e. since the httpRange-14 discussion) or any
documentation that promotes anything other than using # URIs or the
303 redirect approach.

So in the circumstance where someone doesn't want to use a # URI, what
options are available? Can point to a document that illustrates an
alternate approach? It's not really choice if there's only one option.

You also frequently cite dbpedia as the de facto standard model for
publishing Linked Data. This uses the 303 pattern, giving further
prominence to that approach.

> It has always been an option, and so it should remain.

But if there are other options that have a better mix of advantages
and dis-advantages to the two that the community has promoted thus
far, then we should include those too.

Cheers,

L.

-- 
Leigh Dodds
Programme Manager, Talis Platform
Talis
leigh.dodds@talis.com
http://www.talis.com
Received on Friday, 5 November 2010 09:29:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Sunday, 31 March 2013 14:24:30 UTC