[TTL] Long literals
Syntax actions : tests updated ; grammar updated
Today's minutes
Fwd: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs]
- Re: Fwd: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs]
- Re: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs]
Fwd: review of the GeoSPARQl specification
draft response for WG-1
review of the GeoSPARQl specification
Fwd: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs]
Kjetil's comments...
tests to approve - property paths and syntax tests
SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Mar. 29, 2011
Updates to Graph Store protocol editor's draft
Review test cases
Section about Property Paths in the Ent. Reg. spec
ACTION-415 completed (Updates in SPARQL1.1 Update formal model ready for review)
Update comment
RE: ACTION-419: Sync with Birte on Datatypes for canonicalisation
- Re: ACTION-419: Sync with Birte on Datatypes for canonicalisation
- Re: ACTION-419: Sync with Birte on Datatypes for canonicalisation
- Re: ACTION-419: Sync with Birte on Datatypes for canonicalisation
SPARQL Minutes for March 22, 2011
delete-insert test cases
Opinions sought: renaming the dataset protocol to graph store protocol
- Re: Opinions sought: renaming the dataset protocol to graph store protocol
reminder SPARQL TC starts in 5min...
Kjeti;'s open comments
2011-03-22 SPARQL TC Agenda
draft response to SC-1
draft response JB-5
draft response GR-5
New Property Path Tests
SPARQL Query review
Re: SPARQL 1.1 Federation Extensions
Minutes of the SPARQL WG telecon on 2011-03-15
reminder: telecon starts in 10 minutes
apologies
Query Document Review
Review SPARQL Query 1.1, Section 18 (algebra)
- Re: Review SPARQL Query 1.1, Section 18 (algebra)
- Re: Review SPARQL Query 1.1, Section 18 (algebra)
- Re: Review SPARQL Query 1.1, Section 18 (algebra)
- Re: Review SPARQL Query 1.1, Section 18 (algebra)
SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Mar. 15, 2011 - one hour earlier outside of the US!
dataset protocol & service description
SPARQL 1.1 Update Review (part 2)
[tests] New syntax tests for bad updates
question on PATCH (SPARQL 1.1 protocol and SPARQL 1.1 RDF Dataset HTTP Protocol )
SPARQL 1.1 Update Review (part 1)
Executing the decision on blank bodes in DELETE
review service description conformance
regrets
SPARQL WG Agenda - 2011-03-08
SPARQL WG Minutes - 2011-03-01
DELETE templates and blank nodes.
Deleting lists.
New property path tests
MINUS vs. NOT EXISTS (comment JB-2)
Fwd: Re: Planning SIP service as replacement for FR/UK Zakim dial-in numbers
uniqueness of bnodelables per query (comment KK-7)
- Re: uniqueness of bnodelables per query (comment KK-7)
Dataset HTTP Protocol and Service Descriptions
- Re: Dataset HTTP Protocol and Service Descriptions
- Re: Dataset HTTP Protocol and Service Descriptions
DELETE - the process
Fwd: avg testcase issues (was: Re: syntax error in testcase manifest)
SPARQL TC 2011-03-01 Agenda
Re: Reviewing the GeoSPARQL document?
Fwd: Reviewing the GeoSPARQL document?
SPARQL 1.1 Query Aggregates Review
- Re: SPARQL 1.1 Query Aggregates Review
Comment on Dataset-UNION
Test cases for approval
SPARQL TC 2011-02-22 minutes and plan for next week
regrets
Questions about SPARQL 1.1 service description
Review of revised property path tests
Review of Property Path Sections in Query Doc
Agenda 2011-02-22
DELETE-INSERT test cases (including bnodes)
RDF Dataset HTTP Protocol: Priority of the '?default' query component
RedStore tests for the Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs
Update formal model have been updated
minutes from today 2011-02-15
ISSUE-33
PP Tests
ISSUE-66: Should there be an ORDER BY for aggregates, particularly GROUP_CONCAT
test case agg08 fixed
Text for 18.6 Extending SPARQL Basic Graph Matching
Apologies
Nicholas Humfrey's Review of "SPARQL 1.1 RDF Dataset HTTP Protocol"
- Re: Nicholas Humfrey's Review of "SPARQL 1.1 RDF Dataset HTTP Protocol"
- Re: Nicholas Humfrey's Review of "SPARQL 1.1 RDF Dataset HTTP Protocol"
Apologies
Review: SPARQL 1.1 Federated Extensions
response to GR
SPARQL TC 2011-02-15 Agenda
Test cases for exists
Aggregates test case
ACTION-284 Fed. Query review (part 1)
- Documents [was: Re: ACTION-284 Fed. Query review (part 1)]
- ACTION-284 (completed) Fed. Query review (part 2)
minutes from last time... http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2011-02-08
Affiliation change
SPARQL Query 1.1 review
Aggregation Set Functions
[PP] Duplicates with :p*
Test cases & entailment
Draft response to GK-1
Comments on Entailment Regimes from Zhe Wu
function tests
at risk for today
Response to DBeckett-1
Re: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1
- Re: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1
- Re: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1
- Re: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1
- Re: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1
- Re: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1
- Bnodes in DELETE templates (was: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1)
- Re: Bnodes in DELETE templates (was: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1)
- Re: Bnodes in DELETE templates (was: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1)
- Re: Bnodes in DELETE templates (was: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1)
- Re: Bnodes in DELETE templates (was: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1)
- Re: Bnodes in DELETE templates (was: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1)
- Re: Bnodes in DELETE templates (was: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1)
- Re: Bnodes in DELETE templates (was: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1)
- Re: Bnodes in DELETE templates
- Re: Bnodes in DELETE templates
- Re: Bnodes in DELETE templates
- Re: Bnodes in DELETE templates (was: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1)
- Re: Bnodes in DELETE templates (was: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1)
- Re: Bnodes in DELETE templates (was: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1)
- Re: Bnodes in DELETE templates (was: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1)
- Re: Bnodes in DELETE templates (was: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1)
- Re: Bnodes in DELETE templates (was: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1)
- Re: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1
- Re: Bnodes in DELETE templates (was: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1)
- Re: Bnodes in DELETE templates (was: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1)
- Re: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1
- Re: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1
Draft response to HK-2
2011-02-08 SPARQL TC Agenda
SELECT expressions tests are OK
FYI: Implementing SPARQL 1.1 Query - first findings
Service or graph store naming.
- Re: Service or graph store naming.
- Re: Service or graph store naming.
- Re: Service or graph store naming.
- Re: Service or graph store naming.
- Re: Service or graph store naming.
- Re: Service or graph store naming.
- Re: Service or graph store naming.
- Re: Service or graph store naming.
- Re: Service or graph store naming.
- Re: Service or graph store naming.
- Re: Service or graph store naming.
- Re: Service or graph store naming.
- Re: Service or graph store naming.
- Re: Service or graph store naming.
- Re: Service or graph store naming.
- Re: Service or graph store naming.
- Re: Service or graph store naming.
- Re: Service or graph store naming.
- Re: Service or graph store naming.
- Re: Service or graph store naming.
- Re: Service or graph store naming.
- Re: Service or graph store naming.
- Re: Service or graph store naming.
- Re: Service or graph store naming.
- Re: Service or graph store naming.
- Re: Service or graph store naming.
- Re: Service or graph store naming.
- Re: Service or graph store naming.
Review of "SPARQL 1.1 RDF Dataset HTTP Protocol"
All the docs.
Minutes from today's TC
Minutes from last week's TC are now online...
aggregate tests cases ready to approve?
JSON result tests added (completes ACTION-367)
CONSTRUCT WHERE test cases added (completes ACTION-375)
- Re: CONSTRUCT WHERE test cases added (completes ACTION-375)
- Re: CONSTRUCT WHERE test cases added (completes ACTION-375)
- Re: CONSTRUCT WHERE test cases added (completes ACTION-375)
Notice of *possible* regrets
Regrets
fed query doc ready to review
http-rdf-update / editorial
CONSTRUCT and abstract queries
Fwd: Re: Comments about the semantics of property paths
Names (long and short) for JSON results doc
ISSUE-65: Does the SPARQL Protocol need a single form parameter that can take either a query string or an update request string?
Updated editors draft of HTTP RDF Update specification
entailment profiles?
Re: Action 369 -- Look at property path tests
what are COUNT, MIN, MAX, etc.?
Postponed Issues
ACTION-368 : Check coverage and propose new/udpated test for syntax : DONE
ACTION-331 Clarify the meaning of "potentially bound" : DONE
SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Jan. 25, 2011
- Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Jan. 25, 2011
- Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Jan. 25, 2011
- SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Feb. 01, 2011
JSON result serialization revue
Update Protocol messages
BIND tests
New unaddressed comments updated! Please check!
- Re: New unaddressed comments updated! Please check!
- Re: New unaddressed comments updated! Please check!
- Re: New unaddressed comments updated! Please check!
- Re: New unaddressed comments updated! Please check!
Alternative names for HTTP/Update specification
Pre-LC review of SPARQL 1.1 Service Description
ACTION-363: Solicit a DERI reviewer for JSON results document
minutes from last TC...
Question on ACTION-274: Draft some extra bit for federated query tests manifest vocabulary plus example.
- Re: Question on ACTION-274: Draft some extra bit for federated query tests manifest vocabulary plus example.
Re: Draft response for CommentResponse:JP-2
Syntax tests
Calling the US from the UK
Translation to Algebra
SPARQL telecon agenda for 2011-Jan-18
Change of status
Review SPARQL Query?
Review of Service Description Draft
Re: new version of fed query
Today's minutes
SPARQL Update / editorial
quick question on new functions specifications in rq25.xml...
(CONSTRUCT WHERE) Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is
- Re: (CONSTRUCT WHERE) Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is
- Re: (CONSTRUCT WHERE) Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is
- Re: (CONSTRUCT WHERE) Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is
Re: property paths three more test cases pp13, pp14, pp15
Apologies
Agenda TC 2011-01-11
Today's SPARQL WG *Cancelled*
Regrets
regrets
Regrets
Re: Draft response to Ian Davis' comment
SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. January 4, 2011
- Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. January 4, 2011
- Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. January 4, 2011
- Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. January 4, 2011
Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is
- Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is
- Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is
Re: WSDL and POSTing SPARQL Update requests directly
- Re: WSDL and POSTing SPARQL Update requests directly
- Re: WSDL and POSTing SPARQL Update requests directly