- From: Paul Gearon <pgearon@revelytix.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 11:20:04 -0400
- To: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Cc: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>, Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com> wrote: > On 23 Mar 2011, at 22:14, Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On 23/03/11 21:53, Lee Feigenbaum wrote: >>> The SPARQL query spec only specifies an indirect relationship between >>> graph name and contents for FROM and FROM NAMED, right?. USING should >>> be the same thing -- I don't think I understand the problem? >>> >>> Lee >> >> It's not the indirect relationship involved FROM NAMED (query sec 13.2.2). Let's just talk about FROM. >> >> The problem is that FROM typically cause a graph to be read form the web (yes - not in Anzo or Mulgara, but that's unusual). > > Also not in 3/4/5store, FWIW. > >> The update spec says USING is identical to FROM (it uses the word "identical"). > > Right, that's not my recollection if how it was supposed to work. My recollection was that it was just a replacement, hence the word "identical". I can find individual meeting minutes, but is there some way to search all of them? I'd like to find the discussion on this. I know that my point of view was simply to replace the word FROM since it was confusing. If another semantics was suggested, then I missed it at the time. Paul
Received on Tuesday, 29 March 2011 15:20:37 UTC