Re: Service or graph store naming.

On Mar 1, 2011, at 10:33 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:

>> What I'm suggesting is that this case doesn't seem inconsistent with the suggested wording to me:
>> 
>> " The RDF content returned from dereferencing a service URL<U>  MUST include one triple matching: ?service sd:url<U>  ."
> 
> "MUST include one" might imply "and only one"
> 
> What about?
> "MUST include at least one"

I *knew* you were going to suggest that! :)

I was hesitant to do that because I would like the normal case to be one. But yes, that is what technically what I'm proposing. Would that text be acceptable to you?

thanks,
.greg

Received on Tuesday, 1 March 2011 15:44:52 UTC