Kjeti;'s open comments

Hi all,

 I started to draft a response to Kjetil's open comments.
My general rationale here is that - despite the ongoing discussions on other lists - I think that 
the rationale of the SPARQL 1.1 RDF Dataset HTTP Protocol document is merely to provide a RESTful 
version of a subset of the SPARQL protocol, i.e. to provide some more direct acceess to a 
SPARQL endpoints directly via HTTP operations.

Anything beyond that is IMO beyond our WG's charter (that's particular on Kjetil's last comment, but I tried to address all his open comments now...)

Along these lines, I drafted the following response:


this still has two open TODO's which I'd kindly ask Chime to have a look.


Received on Tuesday, 22 March 2011 11:14:25 UTC