- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 11:13:57 +0000
- To: sparQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
- Cc: Chimezie Ogbuji <chimezie@gmail.com>
Hi all, I started to draft a response to Kjetil's open comments. My general rationale here is that - despite the ongoing discussions on other lists - I think that the rationale of the SPARQL 1.1 RDF Dataset HTTP Protocol document is merely to provide a RESTful version of a subset of the SPARQL protocol, i.e. to provide some more direct acceess to a SPARQL endpoints directly via HTTP operations. Anything beyond that is IMO beyond our WG's charter (that's particular on Kjetil's last comment, but I tried to address all his open comments now...) Along these lines, I drafted the following response: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:KK-12 this still has two open TODO's which I'd kindly ask Chime to have a look. best, Axel
Received on Tuesday, 22 March 2011 11:14:25 UTC