- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 22:30:35 +0000
- To: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
- CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 23/03/11 22:15, Gregory Williams wrote: > On Mar 23, 2011, at 10:38 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote: > >> Is there enough coverage in: >> >> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/syntax-update-1/ >> >> >> syntax-update-bad-13.ru >> syntax-update-bad-14.ru syntax-update-bad-15.ru >> >> Probably better to add coverage if not, rather than spread the >> syntax tests through out the test suite. > > Yeah, hadn't looked much into the existing negative syntax tests. I'd > be happy for those to stand (if there's coverage), or to add to them > (if there isn't). I've also noticed that the syntax tests have > started to leak out of the syntax directories already. I can only speak for the ones in the syntax directories, and it's easy to add new ones What's leaked? Having a "syntax area" was quite useful last time, I believe. Andy > > thanks .greg > >
Received on Wednesday, 23 March 2011 22:31:20 UTC