Re: delete-insert test cases

On 23/03/11 22:15, Gregory Williams wrote:
> On Mar 23, 2011, at 10:38 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>
>> Is there enough coverage in:
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/syntax-update-1/
>>
>>
>>
syntax-update-bad-13.ru
>> syntax-update-bad-14.ru syntax-update-bad-15.ru
>>
>> Probably better to add coverage if not, rather than spread the
>> syntax tests through out the test suite.
>
> Yeah, hadn't looked much into the existing negative syntax tests. I'd
> be happy for those to stand (if there's coverage), or to add to them
> (if there isn't). I've also noticed that the syntax tests have
> started to leak out of the syntax directories already.

I can only speak for the ones in the syntax directories, and it's easy 
to add new ones

What's leaked?

Having a "syntax area" was quite useful last time, I believe.

	Andy

>
> thanks .greg
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 23 March 2011 22:31:20 UTC