- From: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 17:30:05 -0500
- To: Chimezie Ogbuji <chimezie@gmail.com>
- Cc: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Mar 1, 2011, at 9:22 PM, Chimezie Ogbuji wrote: > On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Andy Seaborne > <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com> wrote: >> ..snip.. >> Something that might need describing is whether the service providing the >> RDF Dataset HTTP Protocol supports direct or indirect, or both, naming. > > Perhaps, the following specific sd:Features?: > - sd:DirectGraphIdentification > - sd:IndirectGraphIdentification > > i.e.: > > <> a sd:Service; > sd:defaultDatasetDescription </dataset> . > sd:feature sd:DirectGraphIdentification, sd:IndirectGraphIdentification . > > </dataset> a sd:RESTDataset I don't think this is right. Direct- and Indirect-graph identification aren't features of a sd:Service, because a sd:Service is an instance of the SPARQL Protocol (not the Dataset Protocol). .greg
Received on Thursday, 3 March 2011 22:30:41 UTC