- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 11:56:24 +0000
- To: sparQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 22 Mar 2011, at 16:21, Andy Seaborne wrote: > > > On 22/03/11 15:15, Steve Harris wrote: > > I think it's a good idea, the current name is a bit misleading. > > +1 +1, likewise Axel > > > > - Steve > > > > On 2011-03-22, at 14:48, Lee Feigenbaum wrote: > > > >> Based on recent conversations, there has been suggestions that since the dataset protocol is defined against (mutable) graph stores, the name we chose in http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2011-01-25#resolution_3, that we change the name to reflect this. > >> > >> The current name is: > >> > >> SPARQL 1.1 RDF Dataset HTTP Protocol > >> > >> I'd imagine the alternative name would be: > >> > >> SPARQL 1.1 Graph Store HTTP Protocol > >> > >> Please use this thread to express support or concern about this proposed change. We'll make a final decision on the name next Tuesday, and I promise that we won't then revisit it again. :-) > >> > >> Lee > >> > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 23 March 2011 11:57:12 UTC