- From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 09:06:21 -0500
- To: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
We did discuss this at some point and I believe there was a consensus that it ought to be "update". Lee On 1/24/11, Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com> wrote: > From what I remember from the protocol telecon, there will be two methods, > one is x-www-form-urlencoded: > > POST /update/test HTTP/1.1 > Host: localhost:8888 > Accept: text/plain > Content-Length: 62 > Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded > > [???]=INSERT%20DATA%20%7B%20%3Ca%3E%20%3Cp%3E%20%3Cb%3E%20%7D > > but what should [???] be? > > FWIW, 4store uses "update", and 5store uses "query" - hedging our bets :) > > I'm working on some cross-store client code at the moment, and it's a bit of > a blocker. I have no particular preference, but would like a decision one > way or the other. > > - Steve > > -- > Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited > 1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK > +44 20 8439 8203 http://www.garlik.com/ > Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11 > Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD >
Received on Monday, 24 January 2011 14:06:54 UTC