public-rdf-dawg@w3.org from January to March 2011 by date

Thursday, 31 March 2011

• Re: [TTL] Long literals Steve Harris
• Re: [TTL] Long literals Andy Seaborne
• Re: [TTL] Long literals Steve Harris
• [TTL] Long literals Andy Seaborne

Wednesday, 30 March 2011

• Re: ACTION-419: Sync with Birte on Datatypes for canonicalisation Bijan Parsia
• Re: ACTION-419: Sync with Birte on Datatypes for canonicalisation Birte Glimm

Tuesday, 29 March 2011

• Re: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs] Axel Polleres
• Re: ACTION-419: Sync with Birte on Datatypes for canonicalisation Andy Seaborne
• Re: ACTION-419: Sync with Birte on Datatypes for canonicalisation Bijan Parsia
• Re: ACTION-419: Sync with Birte on Datatypes for canonicalisation Bijan Parsia
• Syntax actions : tests updated ; grammar updated Andy Seaborne
• Re: ACTION-419: Sync with Birte on Datatypes for canonicalisation Andy Seaborne
• Re: ACTION-419: Sync with Birte on Datatypes for canonicalisation Bijan Parsia
• Re: ACTION-419: Sync with Birte on Datatypes for canonicalisation Birte Glimm
• Re: Update comment Andy Seaborne
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs] Steve Harris
• Re: Update comment Paul Gearon
• Today's minutes Birte Glimm
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs] Andy Seaborne
• Re: Update comment Paul Gearon
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs] Andy Seaborne
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs] Andy Seaborne
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs] Souripriya Das
• Re: Update comment Paul Gearon
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs] Andy Seaborne
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs] Axel Polleres
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs] Souripriya Das
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs] Axel Polleres
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs] Axel Polleres
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs] Souripriya Das
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs] Steve Harris
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs] Steve Harris
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs] Andy Seaborne
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs] Axel Polleres
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs] Steve Harris
• Re: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs] Axel Polleres
• Re: Fwd: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs] Andy Seaborne
• Fwd: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs] Axel Polleres
• Re: Query Document Review Matthew Perry
• Re: Query Document Review Steve Harris
• Fwd: review of the GeoSPARQl specification Carlos Buil Aranda
• draft response for WG-1 Carlos Buil Aranda
• review of the GeoSPARQl specification Carlos Buil Aranda
• Fwd: RDF-ISSUE-17 (graph merge): How are RDF datasets to be merged? [RDF Graphs] Andy Seaborne
• Re: SPARQL 1.1 Update Review (part 1) Andy Seaborne
• Re: tests to approve - property paths and syntax tests Andy Seaborne
• Re: Draft response JB-2 Axel Polleres
• Re: Draft response JB-2 Steve Harris
• Re: Draft response JB-2 Andy Seaborne
• Re: tests to approve - property paths and syntax tests Gregory Williams

Monday, 28 March 2011

• Re: Draft response JB-2 (was: MINUS vs. NOT EXISTS (comment JB-2)) Axel Polleres
• Kjetil's comments... Axel Polleres
• Re: SPARQL 1.1 Update Review (part 2) Axel Polleres
• Re: SPARQL 1.1 Update Review (part 1) Axel Polleres
• Re: ACTION-419: Sync with Birte on Datatypes for canonicalisation Matthew Perry
• Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Mar. 29, 2011 Steve Harris
• tests to approve - property paths and syntax tests Lee Feigenbaum
• SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Mar. 29, 2011 Lee Feigenbaum
• Updates to Graph Store protocol editor's draft Chimezie Ogbuji
• Review test cases Olivier Corby
• Section about Property Paths in the Ent. Reg. spec Birte Glimm
• Re: ACTION-419: Sync with Birte on Datatypes for canonicalisation Birte Glimm
• Re: ACTION-419: Sync with Birte on Datatypes for canonicalisation Andy Seaborne
• Re: SPARQL Query review Steve Harris
• Re: ACTION-419: Sync with Birte on Datatypes for canonicalisation Andy Seaborne

Sunday, 27 March 2011

• ACTION-415 completed (Updates in SPARQL1.1 Update formal model ready for review) Axel Polleres
• Re: ACTION-419: Sync with Birte on Datatypes for canonicalisation Birte Glimm

Friday, 25 March 2011

• Re: draft response JB-5 Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: draft response to SC-1 Lee Feigenbaum

Thursday, 24 March 2011

• Re: Update comment Andy Seaborne
• Re: Update comment Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: Update comment Andy Seaborne

Wednesday, 23 March 2011

• Re: Update comment Steve Harris
• Re: Update comment Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: delete-insert test cases Gregory Williams
• Re: delete-insert test cases Andy Seaborne
• Re: delete-insert test cases Gregory Williams
• Re: Update comment Andy Seaborne
• Re: Update comment Lee Feigenbaum
• Update comment Andy Seaborne
• Re: Opinions sought: renaming the dataset protocol to graph store protocol Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: Opinions sought: renaming the dataset protocol to graph store protocol Chimezie Ogbuji
• Re: delete-insert test cases Andy Seaborne
• Re: Opinions sought: renaming the dataset protocol to graph store protocol Sandro Hawke
• Re: Opinions sought: renaming the dataset protocol to graph store protocol Axel Polleres

Tuesday, 22 March 2011

• Re: Opinions sought: renaming the dataset protocol to graph store protocol Andy Seaborne
• RE: ACTION-419: Sync with Birte on Datatypes for canonicalisation Matthew Perry
• Re: Opinions sought: renaming the dataset protocol to graph store protocol Steve Harris
• SPARQL Minutes for March 22, 2011 Lee Feigenbaum
• delete-insert test cases Gregory Williams
• Opinions sought: renaming the dataset protocol to graph store protocol Lee Feigenbaum
• reminder SPARQL TC starts in 5min... Axel Polleres
• Re: Kjeti;'s open comments Axel Polleres
• Draft response JB-2 (was: MINUS vs. NOT EXISTS (comment JB-2)) Axel Polleres
• Re: Kjeti;'s open comments Sandro Hawke
• Re: Kjeti;'s open comments Andy Seaborne
• Kjeti;'s open comments Axel Polleres

Monday, 21 March 2011

• Re: draft response GR-5 Andy Seaborne
• 2011-03-22 SPARQL TC Agenda Axel Polleres
• Re: draft response to SC-1 Axel Polleres
• draft response to SC-1 Andy Seaborne
• draft response JB-5 Andy Seaborne
• draft response GR-5 Axel Polleres
• Re: Review SPARQL Query 1.1, Section 18 (algebra) Andy Seaborne
• Re: SPARQL Query review Andy Seaborne

Friday, 18 March 2011

• Re: Review SPARQL Query 1.1, Section 18 (algebra) Andy Seaborne
• Re: Review SPARQL Query 1.1, Section 18 (algebra) Steve Harris
• Re: Review SPARQL Query 1.1, Section 18 (algebra) Andy Seaborne
• New Property Path Tests Matthew Perry

Thursday, 17 March 2011

• Re: Review SPARQL Query 1.1, Section 18 (algebra) Birte Glimm
• Re: Review SPARQL Query 1.1, Section 18 (algebra) Andy Seaborne
• SPARQL Query review Polleres, Axel

Wednesday, 16 March 2011

• Re: SPARQL 1.1 Update Review (part 2) Axel Polleres
• Re: SPARQL 1.1 Update Review (part 2) Andy Seaborne
• Re: SPARQL 1.1 Update Review (part 2) Axel Polleres
• Re: SPARQL 1.1 Update Review (part 2) Andy Seaborne
• Re: SPARQL 1.1 Update Review (part 2) Axel Polleres
• Re: Review SPARQL Query 1.1, Section 18 (algebra) Birte Glimm

Tuesday, 15 March 2011

• Re: Review SPARQL Query 1.1, Section 18 (algebra) Steve Harris
• Re: SPARQL 1.1 Federation Extensions Paul Gearon
• Minutes of the SPARQL WG telecon on 2011-03-15 Andy Seaborne
• Re: apologies Alexandre Passant
• reminder: telecon starts in 10 minutes Lee Feigenbaum
• apologies Paul Gearon
• Query Document Review Matthew Perry
• Re: dataset protocol & service description Chimezie Ogbuji
• Re: Review SPARQL Query 1.1, Section 18 (algebra) Andy Seaborne
• Review SPARQL Query 1.1, Section 18 (algebra) Birte Glimm

Monday, 14 March 2011

• Re: ACTION-284 (completed) Fed. Query review (part 2) Carlos Buil Aranda
• SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Mar. 15, 2011 - one hour earlier outside of the US! Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: dataset protocol & service description Andy Seaborne
• dataset protocol & service description Lee Feigenbaum

Thursday, 10 March 2011

• Re: review service description conformance Andy Seaborne
• SPARQL 1.1 Update Review (part 2) Andy Seaborne
• Re: review service description conformance Gregory Williams
• [tests] New syntax tests for bad updates Andy Seaborne
• Re: question on PATCH (SPARQL 1.1 protocol and SPARQL 1.1 RDF Dataset HTTP Protocol ) Axel Polleres

Wednesday, 9 March 2011

• Re: question on PATCH (SPARQL 1.1 protocol and SPARQL 1.1 RDF Dataset HTTP Protocol ) Chimezie Ogbuji
• question on PATCH (SPARQL 1.1 protocol and SPARQL 1.1 RDF Dataset HTTP Protocol ) Axel Polleres
• SPARQL 1.1 Update Review (part 1) Andy Seaborne

Tuesday, 8 March 2011

• Re: Executing the decision on blank bodes in DELETE Paul Gearon
• Executing the decision on blank bodes in DELETE Andy Seaborne
• review service description conformance Andy Seaborne
• regrets Carlos Buil Aranda

Monday, 7 March 2011

• SPARQL WG Agenda - 2011-03-08 Lee Feigenbaum
• SPARQL WG Minutes - 2011-03-01 Lee Feigenbaum

Friday, 4 March 2011

• Re: SPARQL 1.1 Query Aggregates Review Birte Glimm
• Re: Dataset HTTP Protocol and Service Descriptions Chimezie Ogbuji

Thursday, 3 March 2011

• Re: Dataset HTTP Protocol and Service Descriptions Gregory Williams
• Re: Dataset HTTP Protocol and Service Descriptions Gregory Williams
• Re: DELETE templates and blank nodes. Lee Feigenbaum
• DELETE templates and blank nodes. Andy Seaborne
• Re: Text for 18.6 Extending SPARQL Basic Graph Matching Birte Glimm
• Re: Dataset HTTP Protocol and Service Descriptions Andy Seaborne

Wednesday, 2 March 2011

• Re: Deleting lists. Andy Seaborne
• Re: Test cases for approval Matthew Perry
• Re: Test cases for approval Andy Seaborne
• Re: Test cases for approval Matthew Perry
• Re: Test cases for approval Axel Polleres
• Re: Test cases for approval Matthew Perry
• Re: SPARQL 1.1 Query Aggregates Review Steve Harris
• Re: Test cases for approval Axel Polleres
• Re: Draft answer KK-7 Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: Dataset HTTP Protocol and Service Descriptions Chimezie Ogbuji
• Re: Dataset HTTP Protocol and Service Descriptions Chimezie Ogbuji

Tuesday, 1 March 2011

• Re: Draft answer KK-7 Axel Polleres
• Re: Text for 18.6 Extending SPARQL Basic Graph Matching Andy Seaborne
• Re: Draft answer KK-7 Andy Seaborne
• Re: Test cases for approval Birte Glimm
• Re: New property path tests Andy Seaborne
• Re: Dataset HTTP Protocol and Service Descriptions Andy Seaborne
• Deleting lists. Andy Seaborne
• Re: Service or graph store naming. Gregory Williams
• Re: Service or graph store naming. Andy Seaborne
• Re: MINUS vs. NOT EXISTS (comment JB-2) Gregory Williams
• Re: MINUS vs. NOT EXISTS (comment JB-2) Andy Seaborne
• Re: Service or graph store naming. Gregory Williams
• Re: Text for 18.6 Extending SPARQL Basic Graph Matching Axel Polleres
• Re: Test cases for approval Axel Polleres
• New property path tests Matthew Perry
• Re: Review: SPARQL 1.1 Federated Extensions Carlos Buil Aranda
• Re: Review of revised property path tests Matthew Perry
• Re: SPARQL 1.1 Query Aggregates Review Birte Glimm
• Re: Review of revised property path tests Andy Seaborne
• Re: Evaluation when there are errors in aggregates Steve Harris
• Re: uniqueness of bnodelables per query (comment KK-7) Steve Harris
• Re: Evaluation when there are errors in aggregates Andy Seaborne
• Re: Evaluation when there are errors in aggregates Steve Harris
• Re: Service or graph store naming. Steve Harris
• Evaluation when there are errors in aggregates Andy Seaborne
• Re: Review: SPARQL 1.1 Federated Extensions Axel Polleres
• MINUS vs. NOT EXISTS (comment JB-2) Axel Polleres
• Re: Review: SPARQL 1.1 Federated Extensions Carlos Buil Aranda
• Re: Review: SPARQL 1.1 Federated Extensions Carlos Buil Aranda
• Draft answer KK-7 (was: uniqueness of bnodelables per query (comment KK-7)) Axel Polleres
• Re: Review: SPARQL 1.1 Federated Extensions Axel Polleres
• Re: SPARQL 1.1 Query Aggregates Review Andy Seaborne
• Re: Service or graph store naming. Andy Seaborne
• Re: Service or graph store naming. Gregory Williams
• Fwd: Re: Planning SIP service as replacement for FR/UK Zakim dial-in numbers Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: uniqueness of bnodelables per query (comment KK-7) Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: uniqueness of bnodelables per query (comment KK-7) Axel Polleres
• Re: uniqueness of bnodelables per query (comment KK-7) Lee Feigenbaum
• uniqueness of bnodelables per query (comment KK-7) Axel Polleres

Monday, 28 February 2011

• Re: Review: SPARQL 1.1 Federated Extensions Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: SPARQL 1.1 Query Aggregates Review Steve Harris
• Re: Review: SPARQL 1.1 Federated Extensions Carlos Buil Aranda
• Dataset HTTP Protocol and Service Descriptions Gregory Williams
• DELETE - the process Andy Seaborne
• Fwd: avg testcase issues (was: Re: syntax error in testcase manifest) Andy Seaborne
• SPARQL TC 2011-03-01 Agenda Axel Polleres
• Re: Review of revised property path tests Matthew Perry
• Re: Review of Property Path Sections in Query Doc Andy Seaborne
• Re: Review of Property Path Sections in Query Doc Matthew Perry
• Re: Review of revised property path tests Andy Seaborne
• Re: Review of Property Path Sections in Query Doc Andy Seaborne

Saturday, 26 February 2011

• Re: Reviewing the GeoSPARQL document? Matthew Perry
• Fwd: Reviewing the GeoSPARQL document? Axel Polleres

Friday, 25 February 2011

• SPARQL 1.1 Query Aggregates Review Birte Glimm

Thursday, 24 February 2011

• Re: Bnodes in DELETE templates (was: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1) Birte Glimm
• Re: Bnodes in DELETE templates (was: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1) Birte Glimm
• Re: Questions about SPARQL 1.1 service description Nicholas Humfrey

Wednesday, 23 February 2011

• Re: Bnodes in DELETE templates (was: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1) Paul Gearon
• Re: Bnodes in DELETE templates (was: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1) Axel Polleres
• Re: Bnodes in DELETE templates (was: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1) Birte Glimm
• Re: Comment on Dataset-UNION Polleres, Axel
• Re: Comment on Dataset-UNION Andy Seaborne

Tuesday, 22 February 2011

• Re: Bnodes in DELETE templates Steve Harris
• Re: Bnodes in DELETE templates (was: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1) Axel Polleres
• Re: Agenda 2011-02-22 Steve Harris
• Re: DELETE-INSERT test cases (including bnodes) Axel Polleres
• Re: Bnodes in DELETE templates Axel Polleres
• Re: Comment on Dataset-UNION Axel Polleres
• Re: Bnodes in DELETE templates (was: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1) Birte Glimm
• Re: Bnodes in DELETE templates Andy Seaborne
• Comment on Dataset-UNION Andy Seaborne
• Test cases for approval Birte Glimm
• SPARQL TC 2011-02-22 minutes and plan for next week Axel Polleres
• Re: Questions about SPARQL 1.1 service description Gregory Williams
• Re: regrets Carlos Buil Aranda
• regrets Carlos Buil Aranda
• Questions about SPARQL 1.1 service description Nicholas Humfrey
• Re: Bnodes in DELETE templates (was: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1) Axel Polleres
• Re: Bnodes in DELETE templates (was: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1) Axel Polleres
• Re: Bnodes in DELETE templates (was: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1) Steve Harris
• Re: Bnodes in DELETE templates (was: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1) Paul Gearon

Monday, 21 February 2011

• Review of revised property path tests Matthew Perry
• Review of Property Path Sections in Query Doc Matthew Perry
• Agenda 2011-02-22 Axel Polleres
• Re: DELETE-INSERT test cases (including bnodes) Axel Polleres
• Re: Bnodes in DELETE templates (was: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1) Axel Polleres

Sunday, 20 February 2011

• Re: Bnodes in DELETE templates (was: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1) Gregory Williams
• DELETE-INSERT test cases (including bnodes) Axel Polleres
• Re: Bnodes in DELETE templates (was: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1) Axel Polleres

Friday, 18 February 2011

• Re: Bnodes in DELETE templates (was: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1) Axel Polleres
• Bnodes in DELETE templates (was: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1) Axel Polleres
• Re: Nicholas Humfrey's Review of "SPARQL 1.1 RDF Dataset HTTP Protocol" Nicholas Humfrey
• Re: Nicholas Humfrey's Review of "SPARQL 1.1 RDF Dataset HTTP Protocol" Andy Seaborne
• Re: Nicholas Humfrey's Review of "SPARQL 1.1 RDF Dataset HTTP Protocol" Chimezie Ogbuji
• Re: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1 Lee Feigenbaum

Thursday, 17 February 2011

• Re: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1 Steve Harris
• Re: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1 Paul Gearon
• Re: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1 Andy Seaborne
• Re: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1 Paul Gearon
• Re: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1 Paul Gearon
• Re: RDF Dataset HTTP Protocol: Priority of the '?default' query component Andy Seaborne
• RDF Dataset HTTP Protocol: Priority of the '?default' query component Nicholas Humfrey

Tuesday, 15 February 2011

• RedStore tests for the Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs Nicholas Humfrey
• Update formal model have been updated Alexandre Passant
• Re: Draft response to GK-1 Steve Harris
• Re: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1 Andy Seaborne
• Re: Service or graph store naming. Andy Seaborne
• Re: Service or graph store naming. Gregory Williams
• minutes from today 2011-02-15 Carlos Buil Aranda
• Re: Draft response to GK-1 Axel Polleres
• ISSUE-33 Axel Polleres
• PP Tests Matthew Perry
• ISSUE-66: Should there be an ORDER BY for aggregates, particularly GROUP_CONCAT SPARQL Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Test cases & entailment Birte Glimm
• Re: test case agg08 fixed Gregory Williams
• Re: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1 Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: SPARQL TC 2011-02-15 Agenda Sandro Hawke
• Re: Test cases & entailment Axel Polleres
• test case agg08 fixed Axel Polleres
• Text for 18.6 Extending SPARQL Basic Graph Matching Birte Glimm
• Apologies Nicholas Humfrey
• Nicholas Humfrey's Review of "SPARQL 1.1 RDF Dataset HTTP Protocol" Nicholas Humfrey
• Re: SPARQL Query 1.1 review Andy Seaborne
• Apologies Paul Gearon
• Re: SPARQL Query 1.1 review Andy Seaborne
• Re: SPARQL Query 1.1 review Birte Glimm
• Re: SPARQL Query 1.1 review Birte Glimm
• Re: SPARQL Query 1.1 review Birte Glimm
• Re: response to GR Steve Harris
• ACTION-284 (completed) Fed. Query review (part 2) Axel Polleres
• Re: Service or graph store naming. Andy Seaborne
• Review: SPARQL 1.1 Federated Extensions Lee Feigenbaum
• response to GR Lee Feigenbaum

Monday, 14 February 2011

• Re: Service or graph store naming. Gregory Williams
• Re: Service or graph store naming. Andy Seaborne
• Re: Service or graph store naming. Gregory Williams
• Re: Service or graph store naming. Andy Seaborne
• Re: [PP] Duplicates with :p* Andy Seaborne
• Re: Service or graph store naming. Gregory Williams
• SPARQL TC 2011-02-15 Agenda Axel Polleres
• Re: Aggregates test case Axel Polleres
• Test cases for exists Olivier Corby
• Aggregates test case Olivier Corby
• Re: SPARQL Query 1.1 review Steve Harris
• Re: Aggregation Set Functions Steve Harris
• Re: Aggregation Set Functions Axel Polleres
• Re: Service or graph store naming. Axel Polleres
• Re: Draft response to GK-1 Steve Harris
• Re: Draft response to GK-1 Axel Polleres
• Re: Draft response to GK-1 Steve Harris
• Documents [was: Re: ACTION-284 Fed. Query review (part 1)] Andy Seaborne
• Re: Draft response to GK-1 Andy Seaborne
• Re: Draft response to GK-1 Axel Polleres
• ACTION-284 Fed. Query review (part 1) Axel Polleres
• minutes from last time... http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2011-02-08 Axel Polleres

Saturday, 12 February 2011

• Re: SPARQL Query 1.1 review Andy Seaborne
• Affiliation change Andy Seaborne

Friday, 11 February 2011

• Re: [PP] Duplicates with :p* Andy Seaborne
• Re: SPARQL Query 1.1 review Andy Seaborne
• Re: Service or graph store naming. Gregory Williams
• Re: Aggregation Set Functions Matthew Perry
• Re: Aggregation Set Functions Steve Harris
• Re: Aggregation Set Functions Steve Harris
• Re: Aggregation Set Functions Matthew Perry
• SPARQL Query 1.1 review Birte Glimm
• Re: Aggregation Set Functions Steve Harris
• Aggregation Set Functions Steve Harris

Thursday, 10 February 2011

• Re: [PP] Duplicates with :p* Matthew Perry
• Re: [PP] Duplicates with :p* Lee Feigenbaum
• [PP] Duplicates with :p* Andy Seaborne

Tuesday, 8 February 2011

• Re: Service or graph store naming. Steve Harris
• Re: Service or graph store naming. Gregory Williams
• Re: Service or graph store naming. Chimezie Ogbuji
• Re: Service or graph store naming. Chimezie Ogbuji
• Re: Service or graph store naming. Chimezie Ogbuji
• Test cases & entailment Birte Glimm
• Re: Comments on Entailment Regimes from Zhe Wu Birte Glimm
• Draft response to GK-1 Steve Harris
• Comments on Entailment Regimes from Zhe Wu Matthew Perry
• Re: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1 Paul Gearon
• Re: Response to DBeckett-1 Steve Harris
• Re: Response to DBeckett-1 Steve Harris
• Re: Service or graph store naming. Andy Seaborne
• function tests Gregory Williams
• Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1 Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: Response to DBeckett-1 Andy Seaborne
• Re: Service or graph store naming. Andy Seaborne
• Re: Review of "SPARQL 1.1 RDF Dataset HTTP Protocol" Andy Seaborne
• at risk for today Olivier Corby
• Response to DBeckett-1 Steve Harris
• Re: Draft response to HK-2 Andy Seaborne
• Re: SPARQL Update 1.1 review part1 Paul Gearon
• Re: Draft response to HK-2 Paul Gearon

Monday, 7 February 2011

• Re: Service or graph store naming. Gregory Williams
• Re: Service or graph store naming. Chimezie Ogbuji
• Draft response to HK-2 Paul Gearon
• Re: 2011-02-08 SPARQL TC Agenda Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: Service or graph store naming. Chimezie Ogbuji
• Re: 2011-02-08 SPARQL TC Agenda Andy Seaborne
• 2011-02-08 SPARQL TC Agenda Axel Polleres

Sunday, 6 February 2011

• Re: Service or graph store naming. Andy Seaborne
• SELECT expressions tests are OK Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: Service or graph store naming. Gregory Williams
• Re: Service or graph store naming. Chimezie Ogbuji
• rendering rfc 2119 keywords Sandro Hawke
• Re: Review of "SPARQL 1.1 RDF Dataset HTTP Protocol" Andy Seaborne
• Re: Service or graph store naming. Gregory Williams
• Re: Review of "SPARQL 1.1 RDF Dataset HTTP Protocol" Chimezie Ogbuji

Saturday, 5 February 2011

• Re: FYI: Implementing SPARQL 1.1 Query - first findings Polleres, Axel
• Re: Service or graph store naming. Chimezie Ogbuji
• FYI: Implementing SPARQL 1.1 Query - first findings Ivan Herman

Friday, 4 February 2011

• Service or graph store naming. Andy Seaborne
• Review of "SPARQL 1.1 RDF Dataset HTTP Protocol" Andy Seaborne

Thursday, 3 February 2011

• Re: CONSTRUCT WHERE test cases added (completes ACTION-375) Gregory Williams
• Re: CONSTRUCT WHERE test cases added (completes ACTION-375) Axel Polleres
• Re: CONSTRUCT WHERE test cases added (completes ACTION-375) Olivier Corby

Wednesday, 2 February 2011

• Re: CommentResponse:JP-3 Axel Polleres
• Re: New unaddressed comments updated! Please check! Andy Seaborne
• Re: New unaddressed comments updated! Please check! Chimezie Ogbuji
• All the docs. Andy Seaborne
• Re: JSON result tests added (completes ACTION-367) Andy Seaborne

Tuesday, 1 February 2011

• Re: JSON result tests added (completes ACTION-367) Axel Polleres
• Minutes from today's TC Gregory Williams
• Minutes from last week's TC are now online... Axel Polleres
• Re: JSON result tests added (completes ACTION-367) Andy Seaborne
• Re: Action 369 -- Look at property path tests Matthew Perry
• aggregate tests cases ready to approve? Axel Polleres
• JSON result tests added (completes ACTION-367) Axel Polleres
• Re: CONSTRUCT WHERE test cases added (completes ACTION-375) Axel Polleres
• Re: CONSTRUCT WHERE test cases added (completes ACTION-375) Andy Seaborne
• Re: CONSTRUCT and abstract queries Andy Seaborne
• Re: Action 369 -- Look at property path tests Andy Seaborne
• CONSTRUCT WHERE test cases added (completes ACTION-375) Axel Polleres

Monday, 31 January 2011

• Re: Notice of *possible* regrets Paul Gearon
• Notice of *possible* regrets Paul Gearon
• Regrets Nicholas Humfrey
• Re: Action 369 -- Look at property path tests Matthew Perry
• Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Feb. 01, 2011 Axel Polleres
• SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Feb. 01, 2011 Axel Polleres

Sunday, 30 January 2011

• CommentResponse:JP-3 Andy Seaborne

Saturday, 29 January 2011

• Re: Action 369 -- Look at property path tests Andy Seaborne

Friday, 28 January 2011

• Re: fed query doc ready to review Carlos Buil Aranda
• Re: Names (long and short) for JSON results doc Steve Harris
• Re: fed query doc ready to review Andy Seaborne
• fed query doc ready to review Carlos Buil Aranda
• Re: Names (long and short) for JSON results doc Paul Gearon

Thursday, 27 January 2011

• Re: http-rdf-update / editorial Alexandre Passant
• http-rdf-update / editorial Andy Seaborne
• Re: Names (long and short) for JSON results doc Lee Feigenbaum
• CONSTRUCT and abstract queries Birte Glimm

Wednesday, 26 January 2011

• Re: Fwd: Re: Comments about the semantics of property paths Matthew Perry
• Re: Fwd: Re: Comments about the semantics of property paths Andy Seaborne
• Re: Fwd: Re: Comments about the semantics of property paths Matthew Perry
• Fwd: Re: Comments about the semantics of property paths Andy Seaborne
• Names (long and short) for JSON results doc Andy Seaborne

Tuesday, 25 January 2011

• Re: Action 369 -- Look at property path tests Matthew Perry
• Re: Action 369 -- Look at property path tests Steve Harris
• Re: Action 369 -- Look at property path tests Andy Seaborne
• Re: Action 369 -- Look at property path tests Matthew Perry
• Re: Action 369 -- Look at property path tests Andy Seaborne
• Re: Action 369 -- Look at property path tests Matthew Perry
• Re: Updated editors draft of HTTP RDF Update specification Chimezie Ogbuji
• Re: entailment profiles? Birte Glimm
• Re: Action 369 -- Look at property path tests Gregory Williams
• Re: Updated editors draft of HTTP RDF Update specification Lee Feigenbaum
• ISSUE-65: Does the SPARQL Protocol need a single form parameter that can take either a query string or an update request string? SPARQL Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: entailment profiles? Birte Glimm
• Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Jan. 25, 2011 Alexandre Passant
• Re: what are COUNT, MIN, MAX, etc.? Lee Feigenbaum
• Updated editors draft of HTTP RDF Update specification Chimezie Ogbuji
• Re: Pre-LC review of SPARQL 1.1 Service Description Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: what are COUNT, MIN, MAX, etc.? Steve Harris
• entailment profiles? Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: Action 369 -- Look at property path tests Matthew Perry
• what are COUNT, MIN, MAX, etc.? Lee Feigenbaum
• Postponed Issues Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: New unaddressed comments updated! Please check! Alexandre Passant
• ACTION-368 : Check coverage and propose new/udpated test for syntax : DONE Andy Seaborne
• ACTION-331 Clarify the meaning of "potentially bound" : DONE Andy Seaborne
• Re: BIND tests Andy Seaborne
• Re: New unaddressed comments updated! Please check! Chimezie Ogbuji
• Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Jan. 25, 2011 Chimezie Ogbuji
• Re: BIND tests Lee Feigenbaum
• SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. Jan. 25, 2011 Lee Feigenbaum
• JSON result serialization revue Paul Gearon

Monday, 24 January 2011

• Re: Pre-LC review of SPARQL 1.1 Service Description Gregory Williams
• Re: BIND tests Axel Polleres
• Re: BIND tests Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: BIND tests Andy Seaborne
• Re: Update Protocol messages Steve Harris
• Re: BIND tests Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: Update Protocol messages Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: Update Protocol messages Andy Seaborne
• Re: Update Protocol messages Steve Harris
• Re: Update Protocol messages Lee Feigenbaum
• Update Protocol messages Steve Harris
• Re: New unaddressed comments updated! Please check! Andy Seaborne
• Re: Alternative names for HTTP/Update specification Steve Harris
• Re: Alternative names for HTTP/Update specification Andy Seaborne
• Re: BIND tests Andy Seaborne
• BIND tests Lee Feigenbaum

Sunday, 23 January 2011

• Re: Alternative names for HTTP/Update specification Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: New unaddressed comments updated! Please check! Andy Seaborne
• Re: Alternative names for HTTP/Update specification Andy Seaborne

Friday, 21 January 2011

• New unaddressed comments updated! Please check! Axel Polleres
• Re: Review of Service Description Draft Lee Feigenbaum
• Alternative names for HTTP/Update specification Chimezie Ogbuji
• Re: new version of fed query Lee Feigenbaum
• Pre-LC review of SPARQL 1.1 Service Description Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: new version of fed query Andy Seaborne
• Re: Draft response for CommentResponse:JP-2 Axel Polleres
• Re: Draft response for CommentResponse:JP-2 Andy Seaborne
• Re: Draft response for CommentResponse:JP-2 Axel Polleres
• Re: Draft response for CommentResponse:JP-2 Andy Seaborne
• Re: Question on ACTION-274: Draft some extra bit for federated query tests manifest vocabulary plus example. Axel Polleres
• Re: Draft response for CommentResponse:JP-2 Axel Polleres

Thursday, 20 January 2011

• Re: Draft response for CommentResponse:JP-2 Andy Seaborne
• Re: Question on ACTION-274: Draft some extra bit for federated query tests manifest vocabulary plus example. Andy Seaborne
• Re: Question on ACTION-274: Draft some extra bit for federated query tests manifest vocabulary plus example. Axel Polleres
• Re: Question on ACTION-274: Draft some extra bit for federated query tests manifest vocabulary plus example. Carlos Buil Aranda
• ACTION-363: Solicit a DERI reviewer for JSON results document Axel Polleres
• minutes from last TC... Axel Polleres
• Question on ACTION-274: Draft some extra bit for federated query tests manifest vocabulary plus example. Axel Polleres
• Re: new version of fed query Axel Polleres
• Re: Draft response for CommentResponse:JP-2 Axel Polleres

Tuesday, 18 January 2011

• Syntax tests Andy Seaborne
• Calling the US from the UK Nicholas Humfrey
• Re: SPARQL Update / editorial Paul Gearon
• Re: SPARQL Update / editorial Paul Gearon

Monday, 17 January 2011

• Re: Translation to Algebra Andy Seaborne
• Translation to Algebra Birte Glimm
• Re: SPARQL telecon agenda for 2011-Jan-18 Alexandre Passant
• Re: Generating tests [was: Re: Review SPARQL Query?] Birte Glimm
• SPARQL telecon agenda for 2011-Jan-18 Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: Generating tests [was: Re: Review SPARQL Query?] Andy Seaborne
• Re: (CONSTRUCT WHERE) Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is Andy Seaborne
• Change of status Chimezie Ogbuji
• Re: new version of fed query Carlos Buil Aranda

Sunday, 16 January 2011

• Generating tests [was: Re: Review SPARQL Query?] Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: Review SPARQL Query? Andy Seaborne
• Re: property paths three more test cases pp13, pp14, pp15 Andy Seaborne
• Re: new version of fed query Andy Seaborne

Friday, 14 January 2011

• Re: Review of Service Description Draft Gregory Williams

Thursday, 13 January 2011

• Re: Review SPARQL Query? Steve Harris
• Review SPARQL Query? Birte Glimm
• Review of Service Description Draft Nico Michaelis

Wednesday, 12 January 2011

• Re: new version of fed query Carlos Buil Aranda

Tuesday, 11 January 2011

• Re: (CONSTRUCT WHERE) Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is Gregory Williams
• Re: Draft response to Ian Davis' comment Chimezie Ogbuji
• Re: Draft response to Ian Davis' comment Alexandre Passant
• Re: Draft response to Ian Davis' comment Steve Harris
• Re: SPARQL Update / editorial Andy Seaborne
• Re: quick question on new functions specifications in rq25.xml... Andy Seaborne
• Re: quick question on new functions specifications in rq25.xml... Axel Polleres
• Re: quick question on new functions specifications in rq25.xml... Andy Seaborne
• Re: SPARQL Update / editorial Steve Harris
• Re: (CONSTRUCT WHERE) Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is Steve Harris
• Re: (CONSTRUCT WHERE) Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is Steve Harris
• Today's minutes Alexandre Passant
• Re: SPARQL Update / editorial Andy Seaborne
• Re: SPARQL Update / editorial Alexandre Passant
• Re: (CONSTRUCT WHERE) Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is Andy Seaborne
• SPARQL Update / editorial Andy Seaborne
• quick question on new functions specifications in rq25.xml... Axel Polleres
• Re: Draft response to Ian Davis' comment Axel Polleres
• (CONSTRUCT WHERE) Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is Axel Polleres
• Re: property paths three more test cases pp13, pp14, pp15 Axel Polleres
• Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is Andy Seaborne
• Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Apologies Paul Gearon

Monday, 10 January 2011

• Agenda TC 2011-01-11 Axel Polleres

Wednesday, 5 January 2011

• Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is Eric Prud'hommeaux

Tuesday, 4 January 2011

• Re: Draft response to Ian Davis' comment Chimezie Ogbuji
• Re: WSDL and POSTing SPARQL Update requests directly Paul Gearon
• Re: Draft response to Ian Davis' comment Paul Gearon
• Today's SPARQL WG *Cancelled* Lee Feigenbaum
• Regrets Nicholas Humfrey
• Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is Andy Seaborne
• regrets Olivier Corby
• Regrets Polleres, Axel
• Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is Andy Seaborne
• Re: Draft response to Ian Davis' comment Andy Seaborne
• Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. January 4, 2011 Sandro Hawke

Monday, 3 January 2011

• Re: Draft response to Ian Davis' comment Chimezie Ogbuji
• Re: Draft response to Ian Davis' comment Andy Seaborne
• Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is Andy Seaborne
• Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. January 4, 2011 Carlos Buil Aranda
• Re: SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. January 4, 2011 Alexandre Passant
• SPARQL WG Agenda - Tues. January 4, 2011 Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is Andy Seaborne
• Re: WSDL and POSTing SPARQL Update requests directly Andy Seaborne
• Re: Proposed: SPARQL grammar is complete as-is Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: WSDL and POSTing SPARQL Update requests directly Lee Feigenbaum

Sunday, 2 January 2011

• Re: yacker grammar Eric Prud'hommeaux

Last message date: Thursday, 31 March 2011 09:20:58 UTC