Re: Update Protocol messages

That would be great. Please just let Greg and me know when you've added 
it, so we can avoid any conflicts should we be editing the doc too (hah. 
:-( )

Lee

On 1/24/2011 9:09 AM, Steve Harris wrote:
> OK, that's great then. My memory is not that good!
>
> I'll volunteer to add an example to protocol-1.1 doc if that helps.
>
> Thanks,
>     Steve
>
> On 2011-01-24, at 14:06, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
>
>> We did discuss this at some point and I believe there was a consensus
>> that it ought to be "update".
>>
>> Lee
>>
>>
>> On 1/24/11, Steve Harris<steve.harris@garlik.com>  wrote:
>>>  From what I remember from the protocol telecon, there will be two methods,
>>> one is x-www-form-urlencoded:
>>>
>>> POST /update/test HTTP/1.1
>>> Host: localhost:8888
>>> Accept: text/plain
>>> Content-Length: 62
>>> Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
>>>
>>> [???]=INSERT%20DATA%20%7B%20%3Ca%3E%20%3Cp%3E%20%3Cb%3E%20%7D
>>>
>>> but what should [???] be?
>>>
>>> FWIW, 4store uses "update", and 5store uses "query" - hedging our bets :)
>>>
>>> I'm working on some cross-store client code at the moment, and it's a bit of
>>> a blocker. I have no particular preference, but would like a decision one
>>> way or the other.
>>>
>>> - Steve
>>>
>>> --
>>> Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited
>>> 1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK
>>> +44 20 8439 8203  http://www.garlik.com/
>>> Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
>>> Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD
>>>
>

Received on Monday, 24 January 2011 14:55:59 UTC