- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 09:15:54 -0400
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Cc: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>, sparQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>, Chimezie Ogbuji <chimezie@gmail.com>
On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 11:48 +0000, Andy Seaborne wrote: > Keeping to what we can address in documents is the right way to go. > > Couple of comments: > > 1/ Maybe calling it the "SPARQL 1.1 RDF Graph Store Protocol" would, > with hindsight, be better. +1 Or maybe we need d-snap (true mathematical dataset) and d-box (dataset as a programming data structure, aka graph store). :-) (I'm not sure we get users to really accept that datasets are immutable, so I'm not sure the migration to "graph store" for the mutable ones will work. I say +1 above because I'm sure we wont succeed with this migration if we're inconsistent in our use of the terms.) -- Sandro > 2/ "subset of the SPARQL protocol" - I found that misleading. I know > what you mean - it's a subset of the capabilities - but the way it's > invoked is completely different (it's not a POST of a form or a POST of > a SPARQL Update script) as you go on to say. Maybe say that it's > documenting (not specifying) how a RESTful style is applied, and that > the only definition is POST=>append triples and indirect naming. > > Andy > > > On 22/03/11 11:13, Axel Polleres wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I started to draft a response to Kjetil's open comments. > > My general rationale here is that - despite the ongoing discussions on other lists - I think that > > the rationale of the SPARQL 1.1 RDF Dataset HTTP Protocol document is merely to provide a RESTful > > version of a subset of the SPARQL protocol, i.e. to provide some more direct acceess to a > > SPARQL endpoints directly via HTTP operations. > > > > Anything beyond that is IMO beyond our WG's charter (that's particular on Kjetil's last comment, but I tried to address all his open comments now...) > > > > Along these lines, I drafted the following response: > > > > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:KK-12 > > > > this still has two open TODO's which I'd kindly ask Chime to have a look. > > > > best, > > Axel > > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 22 March 2011 13:16:05 UTC